Experience of Research Ethics Committees in Africa during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author:

Woldeamanuel Yimtubezinash1,Abay Solomon M.1,Ashuro Akililu Alemu2,Berhe Derbew Fikadu3,Degafa Tseday Tilahun2,Munung Nchangwi Syntia4,Tangwa Godfrey B.5,Karbwang Juntra6,Abdissa Alemseged2

Affiliation:

1. Addis Ababa University

2. Armauer Hansen Research Institute

3. Mekelle University

4. University of Cape Town

5. University of Yaounde

6. Thammasat University

Abstract

Abstract Background and objective : Globally, COVID-19 has caused a number of challenges including the functioning of research ethics committees (RECs) with the impact being expected to be more pronounced in resource-limited countries. The objective of this study was to describe RECs' functions and challenges experienced during the pandemic in Africa. Method A cross-sectional study covering Anglophone and Francophone countries in Africa was done. Data was collected using an online Google form questionnaire. The link to the form was sent to REC chairs and secretaries to fill in online. Descriptive data analysis was done using Microsoft Excel and SPSS version 25. Result A total of 98 study participants (50 members and 48 chairs) responded from 16 African countries. The mean (standard deviation) age of REC members was 47 (12) and over half of them, 27 (54%) were female. Most REC members and chairs were physicians, while 48% of RECs were affiliated with academic institutes. Ninety percent of REC chairs reported that their REC was accredited; however, only three had recognition by Strategic Initiative for Developing Capacity in Ethics Review (SIDCER). RECs reported reviewing COVID-19 related protocols. In 2019, chairs reported RECs reviewing 5,860 protocols with a 13% increment in 2020. During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an increment in protocol amendment (79%), deviation (29%), and early protocol termination (25%). Most (96%) RECs followed COVID-19 prevention institutional policies including limiting face-to-face meetings and shifting to virtual platforms. RECs challenges in reviewing COVID-19 related proposals were issues related to risk/benefit, scientific design, and informed consent. Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the functions of RECs in Africa, both in the increase in the volume of proposals for review and presenting new ethical challenges including in risk-benefit analysis. There is a need to strengthen RECs in the region through different mechanisms, by building their capacity through initiatives like the SIDCER recognition program. To strengthen African RECs in a sustainable manner, some of the interventions could be establishing National and regional REC databases, and putting in place continuous training opportunities preferably through an online platform.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3