Quantifying Preferences for Urea Cycle Disorder Treatments Using a Discrete Choice Experiment

Author:

Edelblut Josiah1,Skaar Jeffrey R1,Hilton John2,Seibt Matthew2,Martin Kyle1,Hadker Nandini1,Quartel Adrian2,Steiner Robert3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Trinity Life Sciences

2. Acer Therapeutics

3. University of Wisconsin-Madison

Abstract

Abstract Background Urea cycle disorders (UCDs) are rare, inherited metabolic disorders that can lead to central nervous system toxicity due to ammonia accumulation. Nitrogen-binding medications can be efficacious in the treatment of UCDs but may be associated with attributes that negatively impact adherence. This study sought to quantify the attributes of these medications influencing overall prescription and patient adherence. Results A web-based, quantitative survey including discrete choice experiment (DCE) methodology captured responses from health care providers for patients with UCDs. In the DCE, respondents were presented with a series of hypothetical treatment profile sets that described treatment attributes such as route of administration, taste/odor, preparation instructions, packaging, dose measurement, and weight use restrictions. From 16 choice sets, with 3 hypothetical product profiles, respondents evaluated the product attributes most preferred for overall treatment selection or for patient adherence. A total of 51 respondents completed the survey. Respondents reported dissatisfaction with current treatments [mean rating (SD) = 5.4 (1.7); Likert scale with 1 = not at all satisfied through 9 = extremely satisfied]. Using DCE methodology, four attributes achieved relative importance (RI) scores > 16.67% [i.e., 100/6 (number of attributes), the value if all attributes were considered of equal importance] indicating higher overall preference: taste/odor (24%), weight restrictions (21%), preparation instructions (18%), and route of administration (17%). When considering adherence, three attributes achieved RI scores > 16.67%: taste/odor (28%), preparation instructions (21%), and route of administration (17%). Within the taste/odor attribute, preference weights for “taste/odor masked” were higher than “not taste/odor masked” for overall preference for prescribing [mean (SD); 1.52 (1.10) vs -1.52 (1.10)] and preference for treatment adherence [mean (SD); 73.8 (55.2) vs -73.8 (55.2)]. Conclusions Taste/odor was the most important attribute influencing overall preference for both prescribing and for patient adherence and compliance, with taste/odor masking preferred. Optimizing nitrogen-binding medications to encourage increased patient adherence through masking taste/odor may support improved outcomes in UCDs.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3