Implementation of inclusion and exclusion criteria of clinical studies in the software OHDSI ATLAS

Author:

Blasini Romina1,Buchowicz Kornelia Marta2,Schneider Henning1,Samans Birgit2,Sohrabi Keywan2

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Medical Informatics, University of Giessen

2. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Applied Sciences

Abstract

Abstract Background Clinical trials are an essential part of the medical research process, but trials are often canceled due to lack of enrollment. Clinical trial recruitment support systems can help increase the number of participants by finding more suitable subjects. The ATLAS software (developed by OHDSI) can support the initiation of a clinical trial by building cohorts of patients who meet certain eligibility criteria. The correct use of medical classification systems for clearly defined inclusion and exclusion criteria in studies is an important pillar of this software.Objectives The purpose of this study is to determine whether ATLAS can be used in a Clinical Trial Recruitment Support System to represent the eligibility criteria of clinical trials. Therefore, we have considered the set of criteria implemented in ATLAS and realistically identified the strengths and problems of the software.Methods We analyzed ATLAS using 223 eligibility criteria from 30 randomly selected studies from the past 10 years. Therefore, appropriate ICD, OPS, LOINC, or ATC codes were selected during the data collection process to feed the software. Each criterion and study was ranked for feasibility of implementation in the software.Results According to the observations, 49.33% of the analyzed inclusion criteria are fully implemented in ATLAS. In our selected sample set, 10% of the studies are classified as fully portrayable and 73.33% as portrayable. In addition, the software is evaluated with respect to its usability and its interaction with medical classification systems.Conclusions To improve and extend the coverage of criteria in cohort definition in a real-world setting, we recommend working closely with the individuals involved in the study to precisely define the criteria and carefully select terminology systems. The selected criteria will be combined according to the individual setting. Further work is needed to specify the relevance and quantity of the extracted criteria.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference31 articles.

1. Unsuccessful trial accrual and human subjects protections: an empirical analysis of recently closed trials;Carlisle B;Clin Trials Lond Engl

2. Recruitment and retention of participants in clinical studies: Critical issues and challenges;Desai M;Perspect Clin Res,2020

3. A reinvestigation of recruitment to randomised, controlled, multicenter trials: a review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies;Sully BGO;Trials 2013 Jun

4. Electronic Screening Improves Efficiency in Clinical Trial Recruitment;Thadani SR;J Am Med Inform Assoc

5. Design and multicentric Implementation of a generic Software Architecture for Patient Recruitment Systems re-using existing HIS tools and Routine Patient Data;Trinczek B;Appl Clin Inform,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3