How is diagnostic uncertainty communicated and managed in real world primary care settings?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

How is diagnostic uncertainty communicated and managed in real world primary care settings?

Published:2024-02-26 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:
Container-title:
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Russell Jessica¹,Boswell Laura²,Ip Athena²,Harris Jenny²,Singh Hardeep³,Meyer Ashley ND⁴,Giardina Traber D.³,Bhuiya Afsana⁵,Whitaker Katriina L.²,Black Georgia B.¹

Affiliation:

1. Queen Mary University of London

2. University of Surrey

3. Baylor College of Medicine

4. Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Baylor College of Medicine

5. North Central London Cancer Alliance

Abstract

Background Managing diagnostic uncertainty is a major challenge in primary care due to factors such as the absence of definitive tests, variable symptom presentations and disease evolution. Maintaining patient trust during a period of investigative uncertainty, whilst minimising scope for diagnostic error is a challenge. Mismanagement can lead to diagnostic errors, treatment delays, and suboptimal patient outcomes. Objective Our aim was to explore how UK primary care physicians (GPs) address and communicate diagnostic uncertainty in practice. Design This qualitative study used video and audio-recordings. Verbatim transcripts were coded with a modified, validated tool to capture GPs’ actions and communication in primary care consultations that included diagnostic uncertainty. The tool includes items relating to advice regarding new symptoms or symptom deterioration (sometimes called ‘safety netting’). Video data was analysed to identify GP and patient body postures during and after the delivery of the management plan. Participants All patient participants had a consultation with a GP, were over the age of 50 and had (1) at least one new presenting problem or (2) one persistent problem that was undiagnosed. Approach Data collection occurred in GP-patient consultations during 2017-2018 across 7 practices in UK during 2017-2018. Key Results GPs used various management strategies to address diagnostic uncertainty, including (1) symptom monitoring without treatment, (2) prescribed treatment with symptom monitoring, and (3) addressing risks that could arise from administrative tasks. GPs did not make management plans for potential treatment side effects. Specificity of uncertainty management plans varied among GPs, with only some offering detailed actions and timescales. The transfer of responsibility for the management plan to patients was usually delivered rather than negotiated, with most patients confirming acceptance before concluding the discussion. Conclusions We offer guidance to healthcare professionals, improving awareness of using and communicating management plans for diagnostic uncertainty.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference35 articles.

1. 1. Bhise V, Rajan SS, Sittig DF et al. Defining and Measuring Diagnostic Uncertainty in Medicine: A Systematic Review. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33(1):103–115.

2. 2. Alam R, Cheraghi-Sohi S, Panagioti M, et al. Managing diagnostic uncertainty in primary care: a systematic critical review. BMC Fam Pract. 2017;18(1):79.

3. 3. Cox CL, Miller BM, Kuhn I et al. Diagnostic uncertainty in primary care: what is known about its communication, and what are the associated ethical issues? Fam Pract. 2021;38(5):654–668.

4. 4. Tompson A, Nicholson BD, Ziebland S et al. Quality improvements of safety-netting guidelines for cancer in UK primary care: insights from a qualitative interview study of GPs. Br J Gen Pract. 2019;69(689):e819-e826.

5. 5. Meyer AND, Giardina TD, Khanna A, et al. Pediatric clinician perspectives on communicating diagnostic uncertainty. Int J Qual Health Care. 2019;31(9):G107-G112.