Exploring the Overlap: Comparing STORGIS and ONETOR data between 1950 and 1989

Author:

Schroder Zoe1,Fricker Tyler2

Affiliation:

1. Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University

2. University of Louisiana at Monroe

Abstract

Abstract The current understanding of tornado climatology centers on the Storm Prediction Center's tornado database (ONETOR) which dates back to 1950. To understand tornado climatology before this date, a secondary database (STORGIS) of digitized tornado records over the period 1880–1989 are used. Here, the ONETOR database and STORGIS data set are compared for individual tornadoes and outbreaks with six or more F2+ tornadoes during the overlapping years of 1950 to 1989. For the study period, there are more individual tornado reports in the ONETOR database relative to the STORGIS data set. While both databases suggest a similar broad-scale understanding of tornado climatology spatially and by decade, month, and year, there is a statistically significant difference between the two databases with regards to the total number of reports over the study period. For the study period, there are more tornado outbreaks in the ONETOR database relative to the STORGIS data set. In total, more than 94% of the missing outbreaks in the STORGIS data set are weaker outbreaks with ten or less tornadoes. While the general spatial and temporal patterns of the number and size of tornado outbreaks is similar between the STORGIS data set and ONETOR database, there is a statistically significant difference in the total number and average number of tornado outbreaks between each database. These results herein indicate that while the STORGIS data set is representative of large-scale patterns of F2+ tornado behavior in the United States, it cannot be used synonymously with the ONETOR database without additional statistical methods or context.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference520 articles.

1. James B. Elsner and Svetoslava C. Elsner (2019) More hots: Quantifying upward trends in the number of extremely hot days and nights in Tallahassee, Florida, {USA}: 1892{\textendash}2018. International Journal of Climatology 40(4): 1931--1942 https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6308, Wiley, October, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6308

2. Zoe Schroder and Tyler Fricker (2023) Expanding the historical "outbreak" climatology between 1880 and 1989. Natural Hazards 117(3): 3273--3285 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-05986-z, Springer Science and Business Media {LLC}, April, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-05986-z

3. Todd W. Moore and Tyler Fricker (2020) Tornadoes in the {USA} are concentrating on fewer days, but their power dissipation is not. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 142(3-4): 1569--1579 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-020-03402-1, Springer Science and Business Media {LLC}, September, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-020-03402-1

4. R. J. Trapp and E. D. Mitchell and G. A. Tipton and D. W. Effertz and A. I. Watson and D. L. Andra and M. A. Magsig (1999) Descending and Nondescending Tornadic Vortex Signatures Detected by {WSR}-88Ds. Weather and Forecasting 14(5): 625--639 https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1999)014<0625:dantvs>2.0.co;2, American Meteorological Society, October, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1999)014<0625:dantvs>2.0.co;2

5. Davide Faranda and Stella Bourdin and Mireia Ginesta and Meriem Krouma and Robin Noyelle and Flavio Pons and Pascal Yiou and Gabriele Messori (2022) A climate-change attribution retrospective of some impactful weather extremes of 2021. Weather and Climate Dynamics 3(4): 1311--1340 https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-1311-2022, Copernicus {GmbH}, November, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-1311-2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3