Abstract
Abstract
Background:
This study aimed to compare the efficacy of different gap filling materials in immediate implant in anterior and premolar regions of maxilla.
Materials and Methods:
Thirty-six implants were inserted in patients seeking for replacement of non-restorable maxillary anterior and premolar teeth (esthetic zone) by immediate implant. Patients were randomly distributed into three equal groups, twelve implants in each group. Group 1 received Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) into the jumping distance, Group 2 received Xenograft into the jumping distance and Group 3 received Alloplastic bone grafting material into the jumping distance. Implant stability by measuring the changes in Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA), peri-implant pocket depth, marginal bone loss and changes in buccal bone thickness were evaluated during follow up periods. All the clinical and radiographic data were subjected to statistical analysis by One Way ANOVA test and the Post Hoc Tukey test.
Results:
This study involved 19 female patients and 17 male patients who received 36 dental implants. There was no significant difference between the study groups regarding implant stability, peri-implant pocket depth and palatal bone loss, while there was a significant difference between PRF Group (Group 1) and the other Groups regarding buccal bone loss and changes in buccal bone thickness.
Conclusion:
PRF can be used as a gap filling material in conjunction with immediate implant placement, but other bone grafting materials give superior result regarding buccal bone loss and changes in buccal bone thickness.
Trial registration:
The study was listed on www.clinicaltrials.gov with registration number (NCT05878392) on 26/05/2023. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt, approved the current study in compliance with the seventh revision of the Helsinki Declaration in 2013 (A0103023OS).
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference44 articles.
1. Immediate implants following tooth extraction. A systematic review;Ortega-Martínez J;Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal,2012
2. Das Tübinger Sofort-Implant [The Tübinger immediate implant];Schulte W;Quintessenz,1976
3. Clinical evaluation of immediate implants using different types of bone augmentation materials;Viswambaran M;Med J Armed Forces India,2014
4. Bone healing following immediate versus delayed placement of titanium implants into extraction sockets: a prospective clinical study;Schropp L;Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
5. Immediate or early placement of implants following tooth extraction: review of biologic basis, clinical procedures, and outcomes;Chen ST;Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,2004