Tracing the ‘Degrowth Movement’: Insights from Academic Literature

Author:

Farooq Muzamil1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. SPRU-Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: Over the years, various alternative models of innovation have surfaced globally, aiming to tackle diverse societal issues. One significant area of academic debate in this context has been 'degrowth.' This concept focuses on a fundamental reshaping of political and economic systems, advocating for a reduction in energy and resource consumption. The use of the term 'degrowth' has become more common among researchers and activists, who use it to challenge the principles and costs linked with development driven by growth. The origins of this discussion can be traced back to the early 1990s, and it has since become a focal point in debates surrounding innovation and economic policy. Over time, scholars have scrutinized the concept, connecting it to the status quo or dogma, thereby calling for the conduct of more studies in this regard. This article contributes to the examination of the degrowth discourse over the past decade within scholarly works. Methods: Utilizing R programming, it conducts an in-depth analysis of 933 scholarly articles, revealing the core aspects of this dialogue and offering a data-driven review of the literature. Results: The study identifies various trends within this discourse and, through sentiment analysis of the term, illustrates the increasing agreement and policy focus on degrowth over the past decade. Conclusion: The data analysed review of literature is illustrated through various types of plots, each uncovering the different dynamics of degrowth. The article finally offers various insights about degrowth that can influence the positive development of economic and environmental policies.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference21 articles.

1. Barnett, H.J., Morse, C., 1963. Scarcity and Growth: The Economics of Natural Resource Availability. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.

2. Meadows, D.H., Meadows, D.L., Randers, J., Behrens III, W., 1972. The Limits to

3. Growth. New American Library, New York.

4. Malthus, T.R., 1798. An essay on the principle of population. Libr. Econ. Lib.

5. Jevons, W.S., 1865. The Coal Question: an Enquiry Concerning the Progress of the Nation, and the Probable Exhaustion of Our Coal-mines. Macmillan, London.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3