Can Life Be Quantified?A Survey on Medical Students Based on Ethic Dilemma

Author:

Ren Honglei1,Zhao Tong1,Jiang Zheng2,Shi Lili3,Cai Yuyang1

Affiliation:

1. Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

2. Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences

3. Xinhua Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai

Abstract

Abstract Background In the process of clinical diagnosis and treatment, doctors' decision-making ability is closely related to patients' life, and moral orientation is one of the most important factors affecting clinical decision-making. So this study aims to understand the proclivity of choice by medical students and illustrating the awareness status and features when faced with difficult positions. Methods Develop an electronic questionnaire based on the ethical dilemma cases by Professor Sandel, and then distribute the questionnaires via sojump to the students in Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine in order to investigate their moral orientation. Results The results show that among the trolley dilemma, the scenes in which medical students agree to sacrifice one to save another five in turns are the switch(47.6%), the side track(for a child)(38.0%) and the footbridge scene (8.5%). Postgraduates incline utilitarianism more than undergraduate students in switch and side track(for a child) (P < 0.05), and there are no statistical significances in gender and majors (P > 0.05). While in the emergency doctor case, most students prefer to utilitarianism regardless of whether the critical patient chooses to die voluntarily or not. On the contrary, students tend to choose denotology in organ transplantation case no matter the healthy man is willing to donate his organs or not. And when patient with advanced cancer voluntarily donates organs, female students and postgraduates are more inclined to the utilitarian principle than male students and undergraduates(P < 0.05). There are no statistical significances between majors in emergency doctor and organ transplantation. Conclusions This study suggests that medical students are reluctant to sacrifice one to save the other five, and the specific environment in clinical practice has a great impact on medical students. At the same time, this study suggests that medical ethics education still has shortcomings, which can be further strengthened.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference30 articles.

1. The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect;Foot P;Oxf Rev,1967

2. Interpersonal relationship mindsets and rejection sensitivity across cultures: The role of relational mobility;Lou NM;Pers Indiv Differ,2017

3. How) Do You Regret Killing One to Save Five? Affective and Cognitive Regret Differ After Utilitarian and Deontological Decisions;Goldstein-Greenwood J;Pers Soc Psychol Bull,2020

4. Effect of Psilocybin on Empathy and Moral Decision-Making;Pokorny T;Int J Neuropsychopharmacol,2017

5. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation;Bentham J;American Political Science Association,1962

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3