Head-to-head performance comparison of dedicated vs. general-purpose gamma cameras during gated and perfusion myocardial scintigraphy

Author:

Gaál Szabolcs1,Farkas Bence2,Varga József3,Kracskó Bertalan4,Képes Zita5,Garai Ildikó3,Csanádi Zoltán1,Barna Sandor3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen

2. Division of Nuclear Medicine and Translation Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen

3. Division of Nuclear Medicine and Translational Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen

4. Division of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen

5. Division of Nuclear Medicine, and Translational Imaging, Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen

Abstract

Abstract Background Comparison of the performance of a conventional, Anger-system, general-purpose SPECT/CT (AnyScan SC FLEX) vs. an Anger-system dedicated cardiac SPECT (CardioC) camera for gated myocardial perfusion imaging. Method Fifty patients were enrolled into the study. Of these, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy with 450 MBq SestaMIBI (Mediradiopharma) was performed after dipyridamole stress testing in 43, and at rest in the remaining 7 patients. ECG-gated SPECT acquisition was undertaken with both cameras, with a scanning time of 16 minutes. Within 45 to 60 minutes of the intravenous administration of the radiopharmaceutical, imaging was done first with the CardioC and then – after 30 minutes on average – with the AnyScan SC FLEX camera. The sensitivity of the systems (uptake of the radiotracer by the heart), severity of perfusion defects (SS), and parameters of left ventricular volume and wall motion (EF, EDV, ESV, SV, and cardiac mass) were determined quantitatively with both cameras. All these indices were then compared and the results were subjected to statistical analysis. Results Sensitivity (the scintillation counts recorded within the ROI cardiac projection) was 17.8% (median) higher with the AnyScan FLEX than with the CardioC camera (p < 0.001). There was no meaningful difference between the two cameras in assessing the severity of the perfusion abnormality (p > 0.1). The EF obtained after attenuation correction was significantly lower than without AC. The volume estimates significantly depended on the camera and reconstruction method (p < 0.001); especially, with the FLEX camera the EDV and SV estimates were significantly lower. Attenuation correction of the FLEX images resulted in the lowest estimated myocardial mass(p = 0.004 against the values obtained with CardioC). Conclusions The results support our initial assumption that when used formyocardial perfusion imaging, the performance of general-purpose, digital, hybrid SPECT/CT cameras and dedicated cardiac scanners (both with parallel-hole collimators) is similar in the case of conventional Anger-system devices.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference15 articles.

1. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: past, present and future;Notghi A;Br J Radiol,2011

2. Diagnostic Performance of CMR, SPECT, and PET Imaging for the Identification of Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis;Xu J;Front Cardiovasc Med,2021

3. Contemporary Cardiac SPECT Imaging-Innovations and Best Practices: An Information Statement from the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology;Abbott BG;Circ Cardiovasc Imaging,2018

4. Cadmium-zinc-telluride myocardial perfusion imaging in obese patients;Fiechter M;J Nucl Med,2012

5. Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography: basic instrumentation and innovations;O’Connor MK;Semin Nucl Med,2006

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3