The early impacts of primary HPV cervical screening implementation in Australia on the pathology sector: a qualitative study

Author:

Bavor Claire1,Brotherton Julia ML2,Smith Megan A3,Prang Khic-Houy1,McDermott Tracey2,Rankin Nicole M1,Zammit Claire M1,Jennett Chloe J3,Sultana Farhana4,Machalek Dorothy A5,Nightingale Claire E1

Affiliation:

1. Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne

2. Formerly employed by the Australian Centre for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer

3. The Daffodil Centre, the University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney

4. National Cancer Screening Register, Telstra Health

5. The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales

Abstract

Abstract Background The transition of Australia’s National Cervical Screening Program from cytology to a molecular test for human papillomavirus (HPV) (locally referred to as the ‘Renewal’), including a longer five-year interval and older age at commencement, significantly impacted all sectors of program delivery. The Renewal had major implications for the roles and requirements of pathology laboratories providing services for the Program. This study aimed to understand the early impacts of the Renewal and its implementation on the pathology sector. Methods Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with key stakeholders (N = 49) involved in the STakeholder Opinions of Renewal Implementation and Experiences Study (STORIES), 11–20 months after the program transition. A subset of interviews (N = 24) that discussed the pathology sector were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Results Four overarching themes were identified: implementation enablers, challenges, missed opportunities, and possible improvements. Participants believed that the decision to transition to primary HPV screening was highly acceptable and evidence-based, but faced challenges due to impacts on laboratory infrastructure, resources, staffing, and finances. These challenges were compounded by unfamiliarity with new information technology (IT) systems and the new National Cancer Screening Register (‘Register’) not being fully functional by the date of the program transition. The limited availability of self-collection and lack of standardised fields in pathology forms were identified as missed opportunities to improve equity in the Program. To improve implementation processes, participants suggested increased pathology sector involvement in planning was needed, along with more timely and transparent communication from the Government, and clearer clinical management guidelines. Conclusion The transition to primary HPV screening had a significant and multifaceted impact on the Australian pathology sector reflecting the magnitude and complexity of the Renewal. Strategies to support the pathology sector through effective change management, clear, timely, and transparent communication, as well as adequate funding sources will be critical for other countries planning to transition cervical screening programs.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference31 articles.

1. Cancer Council Australia Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines Working Party. National Cervical Screening Program: Guidelines for the management of screen-detected abnormalities, screening in specific populations and investigation of abnormal vaginal bleeding [Internet]. Sydney: Cancer Council Australia; 2017 [cited 2023 Apr 12]. Available from: https://www.cancer.org.au/clinical-guidelines/cervical-cancer-screening/the-rationale-for-primary-hpv-screening.

2. Impact of the Australian National Cervical Screening Program in women of different ages;Smith M;Med J Aust,2016

3. Long term predictive values of cytology and human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening: joint European cohort study;Dillner J;BMJ

4. Efficacy of HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: follow-up of four European randomised controlled trials;Ronco G;The Lancet

5. Transitioning from cytology-based screening to HPV-based screening at longer intervals: implications for resource use;Smith MA;BMC Health Serv Res 2016 Apr

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3