Affiliation:
1. Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne
2. Formerly employed by the Australian Centre for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer
3. The Daffodil Centre, the University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney
4. National Cancer Screening Register, Telstra Health
5. The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The transition of Australia’s National Cervical Screening Program from cytology to a molecular test for human papillomavirus (HPV) (locally referred to as the ‘Renewal’), including a longer five-year interval and older age at commencement, significantly impacted all sectors of program delivery. The Renewal had major implications for the roles and requirements of pathology laboratories providing services for the Program. This study aimed to understand the early impacts of the Renewal and its implementation on the pathology sector.
Methods
Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with key stakeholders (N = 49) involved in the STakeholder Opinions of Renewal Implementation and Experiences Study (STORIES), 11–20 months after the program transition. A subset of interviews (N = 24) that discussed the pathology sector were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.
Results
Four overarching themes were identified: implementation enablers, challenges, missed opportunities, and possible improvements. Participants believed that the decision to transition to primary HPV screening was highly acceptable and evidence-based, but faced challenges due to impacts on laboratory infrastructure, resources, staffing, and finances. These challenges were compounded by unfamiliarity with new information technology (IT) systems and the new National Cancer Screening Register (‘Register’) not being fully functional by the date of the program transition. The limited availability of self-collection and lack of standardised fields in pathology forms were identified as missed opportunities to improve equity in the Program. To improve implementation processes, participants suggested increased pathology sector involvement in planning was needed, along with more timely and transparent communication from the Government, and clearer clinical management guidelines.
Conclusion
The transition to primary HPV screening had a significant and multifaceted impact on the Australian pathology sector reflecting the magnitude and complexity of the Renewal. Strategies to support the pathology sector through effective change management, clear, timely, and transparent communication, as well as adequate funding sources will be critical for other countries planning to transition cervical screening programs.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. Cancer Council Australia Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines Working Party. National Cervical Screening Program: Guidelines for the management of screen-detected abnormalities, screening in specific populations and investigation of abnormal vaginal bleeding [Internet]. Sydney: Cancer Council Australia; 2017 [cited 2023 Apr 12]. Available from: https://www.cancer.org.au/clinical-guidelines/cervical-cancer-screening/the-rationale-for-primary-hpv-screening.
2. Impact of the Australian National Cervical Screening Program in women of different ages;Smith M;Med J Aust,2016
3. Long term predictive values of cytology and human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening: joint European cohort study;Dillner J;BMJ
4. Efficacy of HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: follow-up of four European randomised controlled trials;Ronco G;The Lancet
5. Transitioning from cytology-based screening to HPV-based screening at longer intervals: implications for resource use;Smith MA;BMC Health Serv Res 2016 Apr