“One’s life becomes even more miserable when we hear all those hurtful words.” A mixed methods systematic review of disrespect and abuse in abortion care.

Author:

Munnangi Meghana1,Shreedhar Priya2,Lippus Hedda3,Gilyan Regina2,Evans Dabney P.4,Maxwell Lauren2

Affiliation:

1. Western University of Health Sciences College of Osteopathic Medicine

2. Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg

3. University of Tartu

4. Emory University

Abstract

Abstract Background Disrespect and abuse during facility-based abortion and postabortion care (PAC) manifests in various forms, including disrespect, abuse (physical, verbal, and sexual), stigma, discrimination, failure to meet standards of care, neglect, breaches in privacy and confidentiality, misinformation or a lack of information, mistreatment or undignified care, and protests. The objective of this mixed methods systematic review was to describe the various forms of disrespect and abuse that women face during abortion or PAC. Methods We conducted a comprehensive literature search in Embase, Medline, and PubMed using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and text-based terms targeting disrespect and abuse in facility-based abortion care. The initial search was conducted in 2019, followed by an updated search in 2023. Thirty-eight articles conducted in 20 countries met inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Results The most frequently observed form of disrespect and abuse, identified in 31 studies, was the failure to meet care standards in providing quality abortion care or PAC, particularly in terms of offering adequate and accurate information to women before, during and after the procedures. Additionally, stigma was reported in 20 studies, disrespect in 19 studies, discrimination in 10 studies, and both verbal and physical abuse, as well as humiliation and condescension, each in 8 studies. The presence of abortion protestors was also noted in 8 studies. Conclusions Our results indicate the need for multi-level strategies to transform healthcare providers' perceptions and attitudes towards women seeking abortion care, and other actions at the individual, institutional, and policy levels to provide quality, respectful abortion care. We found that providers sometimes highlighted caste or other markers of vulnerability as part of disrespectful care. The systematic measurement of disrespect and abuse in abortion care and PAC could help understand the distribution of experiences across different groups.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference124 articles.

1. Global, regional, and subregional classification of abortions by safety, 2010-14: estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model;Ganatra B;Lancet,2017

2. Addressing barriers to safe abortion;Culwell KR;Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2013

3. Unsafe abortion: global and regional incidence, trends, consequences, and challenges;Shah I;J Obstet Gynaecol Can,2009

4. Unsafe abortion. global and regional estimates of the incidence of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2008. World Health Organization; 2011.

5. Abortion stigma: a reconceptualization of constituents, causes, and consequences;Norris A;Womens Health Issues,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3