Examining Provider Practice-Level Disparities in Delivery Outcomes Among Patients with a History of Cesarean Delivery

Author:

McCarthy Lily1,Tavella Nicola2,Wetzler Sara1,Ardente Lily1,Chadwick Molly3,Paul Dexter2,Sabet Nikki2,Stern Toni2,Bianco Angela2

Affiliation:

1. Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

2. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

3. Princeton University

Abstract

Abstract Background Choosing whether to pursue a trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) or elective repeat cesarean delivery (ERCD) requires prenatal assessment of risks and benefits. Providers play a central role in this process. However, the influence of provider-associated characteristics on delivery methods remains unclear. In this study we hoped to evaluate the impact of provider practice-level differences on delivery choice and outcome in a cohort of patients with prior cesarean delivery (CD). Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of deliveries between April 29, 2015 – April 29, 2020. Subjects were divided into three cohorts: ERCD, successful VBAC, and unsuccessful VBAC (patients who opted for TOLAC but delivered by CD). Disparities were reviewed between different obstetric provider practices, examining proportional differences through Chi-squared tests and logistic regression models. The delivering provider practice was determined from a breakdown of different providers delivering at the study site during the study period. Results 1,765 deliveries were included in the study. There were significant proportional disparities between patients in the different delivery groups. Specifically, patients with a provider in a midwifery practice were significantly more likely to undergo successful VBAC, while patients seeing a private obstetrician were more likely to deliver by ERCD (p < 0.001). In our multivariate analysis of successful VBAC versus unsuccessful VBAC, patients delivered by the Refuah (16.62; 95%CI: 2.54, 30.61) and midwife (14.12; 95% CI: 2.83, 25.71) practices had greater odds ratios of VBAC compared to the private obstetrician group. In our multivariate analysis of unsuccessful VBAC versus ERCD, patients delivered by the Refuah (29.92; 95% CI: 9.92, 70.34) and house staff (2.35; 95% CI: 1.40, 4.00) practices had greater odds ratios of unsuccessful VBAC compared to the private obstetrician group. Conclusion This study suggests that provider practice-level differences may be one factor influencing CD rates. These data also illuminate under-researched areas in which culture influences maternal and neonatal delivery outcomes. These findings help to guide future investigations to improve outcomes among patients with a history of CD. Trial Registration Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Program for the Protection of Human Subjects, STUDY ID 20–00633, Approved 6/17/2020

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3