Intraoperative Aberrometer Plus Image-Guided System for Astigmatism Correction Compared to Standard Image-Guided System for Significant Lens Opacity

Author:

Chou Michael Chia-Yen1,Lee Chia-Yi1,Yang Shun-Fa1,Lin Hung-Yu1,Chen Yu-Shu2

Affiliation:

1. Chung Shan Medical University

2. Show Chwan Memorial Hospital

Abstract

Abstract

Background To evaluate the astigmatism after cataract surgery between the use of intraoperative aberrometer plus image-guided system (VLynk) and image-guided system alone (Verion) in patients with significant lens opacity. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study performed at First-Brightness Eye Clinic, Taichung, Taiwan. Patients with significant lens opacity whom received cataract surgery with VLynk were compared to the control group receiving surgery with Verion. Main outcomes included the corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), astigmatism, spherical equivalent (SE) status and the predicting factor for less astigmatism in the two groups. The generalized estimated equation (GEE) was used to produce the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Results 73 patients were enrolled in the study group (VLynk); 76 individuals constituted the control group (Verion). Preoperative and postoperative CDVA between both groups were similar (all P > 0.05). The preoperative cylinder power, preoperative SE and estimated SE were statistically insignificant between the VLynk and Verion groups (all P > 0.05). The postoperative cylinder power (P = 0.002), postoperative SE (P = 0.004) and difference between real SE and estimated SE (P = 0.001) were significantly lower in the VLynk group. Implantation of toric IOL was associated with less astigmatism in the both groups (both P < 0.05). Longer axial length (P = 0.013) and higher central corneal power (P = 0.023) were correlated to higher astigmatism in the Verion group. Conclusion VLynk is correlated with better postoperative astigmatism control and predictability compared to Verion in patients with significant lens opacity.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3