COVID-19 vaccination acceptance and hesitancy in health and care workers and the general population: a systematic review and policy recommendations

Author:

Silva Alessandra Pereira Pereira1ORCID,Castaneda Luciana2,de Oliveira Ana Paula Cavalcante3,Fronteira Inês4,Craveiro Isabel4,Maia Leila Senna3,Chança Raphael1,Boniol Mathieu5,Ferrinho Paulo4,Poz Mario Roberto Dal3

Affiliation:

1. National Cancer Institute

2. Universidade do Rio de Janeiro: Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

3. Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

4. Universidade Nova de Lisboa Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical

5. World Health Organization

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic challenged the scientific community to find and develop a vaccine to fight the disease. However, and despite the vaccines developed thus far, problems with achieving high vaccine coverages have emerged, even among high-risk groups such as health and care workers (HCW). The lack of experience with such extensive vaccination created knowledge gaps in health policy and multisector decisions worldwide. Objective: This systematic review aims to examine factors that influence HCW's adherence to COVID-19 vaccination and national policies to vaccinate the HCW and other target groups. Methods: Searches were performed in the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science, Lilacs, and WHO databases, besides Google Scholar for grey literature. The eligibility criterion for inclusion was being a member of the HCW. Vaccination was the target intervention, and the COVID-19 pandemic was the context. Qualitative synthesis used a meta-aggregation approach. Results: Nineteen articles were included in the review, with study samples varying from 48 to 5,708 participants. Most of the evidence came from cross-sectional and qualitative studies. The main findings were related to vaccine hesitancy rather than acceptance. Factors associated with HCW vaccine hesitancy included subjective feelings such as safety concerns, related to rapid vaccine development, and insufficient testing. Non-adherence to vaccination by HCW can contribute to vaccine hesitancy in the general population. Countries have adopted few public policies to address this problem, and the main concern is whether to enforce vaccination and the extent to which measures are legal. Conclusion: Despite the large number of studies identified in the review, the quality of the evidence base remains weak. Skepticism, mistrust, and hesitancy toward vaccination are global issues that can jeopardize vaccination coverage. Governments need guidance to develop gender-specific policies to inform HCW and the public about the need to adhere to vaccination in the current and future pandemic scenarios.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference35 articles.

1. Baltar R. Desenvolvimento, globalização e trabalho decente. Cad CRH [Internet]. 2013;26(67):105–22. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-49792013000100008&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=pt.

2. WHO. WHO Coronavirus Dashboard [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Sep 23]. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/table.

3. McPake B, Maeda A, Araújo EC, Lemiere C, El Maghraby A, Cometto G. Why do health labour market forces matter? Bull World Health Organ. 2013 Nov 1;91(11):841–6.

4. Planning for a COVID-19 Vaccination Program;Schaffer Deroo S;JAMA - J Am Med Assoc,2020

5. The legality and ethics of mandatory COVID-19 vaccination;Emily A;• Perspect Biol Med,2021

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3