Quantifying the Energetic Cost Tradeoffs of Photovoltaic Pumping Systems for Sub-Saharan African Smallholder Farms
Author:
Liang ZhiYi1, Shorter Amanda L.1, V Amos G. Winter1
Affiliation:
1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Abstract
AbstractAs solar technologies have matured, irrigation using photovoltaic pumping systems (PVPSs) has gained popularity in developing markets as an effective means to alleviate poverty and increase food security. Yet there remains a barrier to adoption; the upfront cost of PVPS poses a financial burden for many low-income farmers. In a PVPS, the capital cost of the solar array contributes a large portion of upfront system costs. The solar pump is the largest energy consumer in the system, thus its efficiency directly impacts the size and cost of the solar array. There is limited quantitative understanding about how solar pump efficiency affects the capital cost of the solar array. This study presents a technoeconomic framework to directly quantify the impact of solar pump efficiency on the cost of the solar array in a PVPS for a range of hydraulic operating conditions. New empirical efficiency scaling laws were created by characterizing the efficiencies of 4-inch multistage centrifugal borehole pumps and induction motors. The utility of the technoeconomic framework is demonstrated through a case study comparing solar pump architectures with motors of different efficiencies. Results indicate that, despite increased motor cost, the use of high efficiency motors in solar pumps may lead to an overall cost reduction in a PVPS. Counter to the conventional capital cost-driven process, this work demonstrates that an efficiency-driven design process could improve low-cost, solar-powered system design. Engineers and system designers can leverage the presented framework during the design process to make informed decisions to achieve more cost-effective PVPS.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. MacDonald, A. M. and Bonsor, H. C. and Dochartaigh, B. E O and Taylor, R. G. (2012) {Quantitative maps of groundwater resources in Africa}. Environmental Research Letters 7(2) https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/2/024009, Africa, climate change, groundwater, water resources, 17489326 2. {IFAD}. {Smallholders, food security, and the environment}. Rome, Italy, International Fund for Agricultural Development, https://www.ifad.org/documents/38714170/39135645/smallholders_report.pdf/, 2013 3. Lowder, Sarah K. and Skoet, Jakob and Raney, Terri (2016) {The Number, Size, and Distribution of Farms, Smallholder Farms, and Family Farms Worldwide}. World Development 87: 16--29 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.041, family farm, farm size, farmland distribution, small farm, smallholder, 18735991, Elsevier Ltd, 11 4. Closas, Alvar and Rap, Edwin (2017) {Solar-based groundwater pumping for irrigation: Sustainability, policies, and limitations}. Energy Policy 104: 33--37 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.035, Groundwater, Irrigation, Policy, Solar technology, Sustainability, 03014215, Elsevier Ltd 5. Burney, Jennifer A. and Naylor, Rosamond L. (2012) {Smallholder Irrigation as a Poverty Alleviation Tool in Sub-Saharan Africa}. World Development 40(1): 110--123 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.05.007, Africa, Agriculture, Benin, Crop diversification, Irrigation, Solar technology, 0305750X, 1
|
|