Biotechnology patenting: Limits of ordre public and morality provisions

Author:

Mafu Mhlambululi1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Physics, Case Western Reserve University

Abstract

AbstractThe world is experiencing explosive technological progress in biotechnology, leading to unprecedented benefits such as improved or new medicines, treatments, and processes with the potential to transform and save human lives. However, as novel technological frontiers are crossed, there have been increased concerns about how biotechnology inventions are granted or refused exclusive patent protection. Besides meeting patentability requirements, various countries consider most biotechnology inventions contrary to their ordre public and morality provisions and exclude them from protection using intellectual property rights. Notably, the meaning of these provisions is dynamic and varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, thus affecting the patentability of biotechnology inventions. Adopting the doctrinal research approach, we comparatively study various case laws, statutes, and legal sources from international, national and regional patent laws, including the impact of patent flexibilities on biotechnology inventions. Furthermore, we investigate the limit imposed by ordre public or morality provisions as grounds to refuse to grant biotechnology patents to benefit the community’s interest and invalidate it for the inventor. We review the current landscape for ordre public and morality limits on the patentable subject matter by analyzing relevant patent disputes and the impact of the decisions. We argue that ordre public and moral exclusions or exceptions have become entangled in Patent Law, so they must be interpreted and applied such that their outcomes do not hamstring patent granting for disruptive biotechnology inventions because of their more expansive ethical, societal, and legal effects. Moreover, this might require a critical demand to deal with controversial biotechnological issues on case-by-case decisions instead of a broad, inflexible, and comprehensive ban. While there is a need to adapt the ordre public and morality exclusions to accommodate biotech inventions, Patent Officers and Courts must be resourced to handle these exclusions. Most significantly, this study exposes the interplay and impact between patent laws as a commercial tool and the role of regulatory systems in the administration of biotechnology inventions. This is crucial to ensure fair and equal access to the merits of using biotechnologies for scientific development.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference126 articles.

1. WIPO. (2004). WIPO intellectual property handbook: Policy, law and use (Vol. 489).

2. Bently, L., & Sherman, B. (2014). Intellectual property law. Oxford University Press, USA.

3. Idris, K. (2008). WIPO Intellectual Property Handbook: Policy, Law and Use. Geneva: WIPO publication, 489.

4. Patent first, ask questions later: morality and biotechnology in patent law;Bagley MA;Wm. & Mary L. Rev.,2003

5. Inventions in genetic engineering, protection of intellectual property rights and licensing;Twardowska A;Biotechnologia,2003

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3