Affiliation:
1. Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology School of Atmospheric Sciences
2. New South Wales Department of Planning and Environment
3. Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology
4. Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology School of Atmospheric Physics
5. Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology
Abstract
Abstract
The Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO) provides an important source of global subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) predictability, while its prediction remains great challenges. Based on an atmosphere-ocean coupled model and the widely-used nudging method, suitable initialization and ensemble schemes are explored toward an improved MJO prediction. Results show that the ensemble strategy with perturbed atmospheric nudging coefficients facilitates adequate ensemble spread and hence improves the prediction skill. Finally, an 18-member ensemble subseasonal prediction system called NUIST CFS1.1 is developed.
Skill evaluation indicates that the NUIST CFS1.1 can extend the MJO prediction to 24 days lead, which reaches the world-average level but is far from the estimated potential predictability (~45 days). The limited skill at longer lead times corresponds to forecast errors exhibiting slower propagation and weaker intensity, which are largely owing to the model’s shortcoming in representing MJO-related physical processes. Despite the absence of dry bias, obvious biases in horizontal moisture gradients remain. Moreover, the model underestimates the diabatic heating (mostly contributed by the latent heat release) of enhanced convection and fails to reproduce the suppressed convection within the MJO structure, collaboratively weakening the Kelvin/Rossby waves. This causes weaker horizontal winds and ultimately reduces the horizontal moisture advection on the two flanks of MJO convection. Furthermore, the underestimated Kelvin wave induces insufficient planetary boundary layer (PBL) convergence and thereby results in poor simulation of PBL premoistening ahead of MJO convection. However, the relative strength between the Kelvin and Rossby wave keeps stationary as the forecast time increases, and thus is not a determining factor for MJO prediction in the NUIST CFS1.1. The above biases limit the MJO prediction, prompting further efforts to improve the model physics.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference90 articles.
1. The MJO as a Dispersive, Convectively Coupled Moisture Wave: Theory and Observations;Adames ÁF;J Atmos Sci,2016
2. Moisture Mode Theory’s Contribution to Advances in our Understanding of the Madden-Julian Oscillation and Other Tropical Disturbances;Adames ÁF;Curr Clim Change Rep,2021
3. Ahn MS, Kim D, Kang D, Lee J, Sperber KR, Gleckler PJ, Jiang X, Ham YG, Kim H (2020) MJO propagation across the maritime continent: are CMIP6 models better than CMIP5 models? Geophys Res Lett 47(11): pe2020GL087250
4. Moist Static Energy Budget of MJO-like Disturbances in the Atmosphere of a Zonally Symmetric Aquaplanet;Andersen JA;J Clim,2012
5. Initial Error Growth and Predictability of Chaotic Low-dimensional Atmospheric Model;Bednář H;Int J Autom Comput,2015