Discrepancies among hospital physicians regarding the Do Not Attempt Resuscitation order and its interpretation

Author:

Keränen Tapani1,Kuusisto Hanna2

Affiliation:

1. University of Eastern Finland

2. Tampere University Hospital

Abstract

Abstract Background A Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) order is one of the most important medical decisions in providing adequate end-of-life care. There is variation in national and local policies of making a DNAR order in spite of the recent European guidelines. Physicians in general perceive challenges in making a DNAR order. However, possible variation across different clinical specialties is not known. Methods A link to the web-based multiple-choice questionnaire (Webropol) was sent by e-mail to all physicians and nurses working in the Tampere University Hospital special responsibility area covering a catchment area of 900,000 Finns. The questionnaire, developed by the authors, covered issues on DNAR order making, its meaning and documentation. Participants responded anonymously. Results In total, 934 subjects responded, of which 216 (23%) were physicians covering all specialties. A total of 154 (71%) of respondents were specialists and 62 (29%) were physicians in training. The responses of physicians were categorized into six categories according to clinical specialty: anesthesiology and intensive care unit (ICU), conservative departments, surgical departments, oncology, pediatrics and pediatric neurology, and psychiatry. In total, 63% of doctors in oncology and 73% in pediatric/pediatric neurology departments correctly recognized that a DNAR order relates only to cardiopulmonary resuscitation, while only 27–46% of physicians in anesthesiology or ICU, conservative and surgical departments, and psychiatry correctly recognized the meaning of DNAR. Challenges in interpreting the meaning of the DNAR order had been experienced by 62% of physicians in anesthesiology/ICU, 66% in conservative departments and 49% in operative departments, whereas frequencies were lower in oncological, pediatric/pediatric neurology and psychiatric departments (36–38%). Training in making a DNAR order was considered adequate by 66% of physicians in anesthesiology, 87% in oncology, and by only 20–56% of doctors in other specialties. Conclusion Our findings show specialty-related variation among hospital physicians in the interpretation of the scope of the DNAR order and who should be included in the decision-making process. There is need for further training in making a DNAR order in major hospital specialties.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3