Disseminating the IKT Guiding Principles: What did we do? Where did we go? What do we do and where do we go next?

Author:

Shwed Alanna1,Hoekstra Femke1,Bhati DivyaKanwar1,Athanasopoulos Peter2,Chernesky John3,Ginis Kathleen Martin1,McBride Christopher4,Mortenson W.Ben1,Sibley Kathryn5,Sweet Shane6,Panel SCI Guiding Principles Consensus,Gainforth Heather1

Affiliation:

1. University of British Columbia

2. Spinal Cord Injury Ontario

3. Praxis Spinal Cord Institute

4. Spinal Cord Injury BC

5. University of Manitoba

6. McGill University

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Knowledge mobilization, specifically dissemination, and research partnerships are helpful for ensuring research is translated to practice. However, empirical data reporting on the processes and outcomes of a partnership approach to dissemination are limited. Sharing and promoting the Integrated Knowledge Translation (IKT) Guiding Principles for conducting and disseminating spinal cord injury research in partnership provide an ideal opportunity to demonstrate the processes and outcomes of a partnership approach to dissemination. Methods The dissemination process of the IKT Guiding Principles included four iterative phases: 1) planning dissemination, 2) conducting dissemination; 3) evaluating dissemination, and 4) reflecting on dissemination. Dissemination activities and outcomes were tracked using 5 sources: a partnership tracking survey, a partnership curriculum vitae, Google Analytics, team emails, and a citation-forward search. Important outcomes tracked were exposure, engagement, and citations. Exposure and engagement to the IKT Guiding Principles were defined as the number of times and/or locations the IKT Guiding Principles were accessed and/or downloaded. Results The IKT Guiding Principles Partnership planned dissemination of the guiding principles from the beginning of the project. Dissemination activities formally commenced with a variety of approaches including direct emails, social media posts, a webinar, academic and community presentations, journal publications. Within the first 20 months of publication, the guiding principles were viewed 3058 times, accessed in 31 different countries (exposure), downloaded 282 times (engagement), and cited 30 times. Conclusion This project provides an overview of metrics and methodology that can be used to monitor and evaluate the processes and outcomes of an IKT approach to dissemination. Overall, a co-production approach may be helpful for disseminating research findings; however, more research is needed to understand the impact of an IKT approach on the dissemination and implementation of research findings.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference22 articles.

1. Bridging the Gap Between Research and Practice: Predicting What Will Work Locally;Joyce KE;Am Educ Res J,2020

2. Research–Practice Gap in Applied Fields: An Integrative Literature Review;Tkachenko O;Human Resource Development Review. 2017

3. The. “17 year gap”: its origin, evolution and relevancy [Internet]. 2022. Available from: https://www.msfhr.org/1/webinar/the-17-year-gap-its-origin-evolution-and-relevancy.

4. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research;Morris ZS;J R Soc Med,2011

5. Knowledge translation of research findings;Grimshaw JM;Implement Sci,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3