Affiliation:
1. Hochschule Niederrhein
Abstract
Abstract
The essay aims to unite two currently distinct lines of thinking and working with language. Large Language Models and continental philosophy, especially Martin Heidegger’s thinking about language and, building upon Sigmund Freud, Jaques Lacan’s structural psychoanalysis. We show that the concept of language that Heidegger, Freud and Lacan discuss and utilize in clinical frameworks is matched quite strongly by modern LLMs. This allows us to discuss a problem of negation and negativity that is central to the continental discourse but missing in current LLM research. This also means that we offer a radically different approach than it is usual in the philosophy of artificial intelligence, since we base our concepts on thinkers that are often disregarded in the analytic philosophy discourse that is closer linked to AI research. To this end we also mark, where the ontological differences of the proposed approach lie. However, our aim is to address AI researcher and continental philosophers.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference43 articles.
1. “Language Models Are Unsupervised Multitask Learners;Alec Radford J;Adv Neural Inf Process Syst,2019
2. Badiou A (2006) Being and Event. Continuum, London
3. Bishop CM (2006) Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Computer science. Springer, New York, NY
4. Blumenberg H, and Robert Ian Savage (2010) Paradigms for a Metaphorology. Signale. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y, s.l
5. Language Models Are Few-Shot Learners;Brown TB;NeurIPS 2020,2020