Affiliation:
1. Nanjing University Medical School Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital
2. Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital: Nanjing University Medical School Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital
3. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
4. Southeast University Zhongda Hospital
5. Hangzhou Normal University School of Clinical Medicine: Hangzhou Normal University Affiliated Hospital
Abstract
Abstract
Background & aims: Data on the effects of liver fibrosis and hepatic steatosis on outcomes in diabetic patients are limited. Therefore, we investigated the predictive value of the fibrosis and the severity of hepatic steatosis for all-cause mortality in diabetes patients.
Methods: A total of 1,903 patients with diabetes from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) dataset were enrolled. Presumed hepatic fibrosis was evaluated with Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4). The mortality risk and corresponding hazard ratio (HR) were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models.
Results: Over a median follow-up of 19.4 years, all-cause deaths occurred in 69.6%. An FIB-4 ≥1.3 was an independent predictor of mortality in diabetic patients (HR: 1.198, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.054-1.361, p =0.006). Overall, an FIB-4 ≥1.3 without moderate-severe steatosis increased the mortality risk (HR: 1.277; 95%CI: 1.077-1.513, p =0.005). The similar results were found in diabetes patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) (HR: 1.457; 95%CI: 1.045-2.032, p =0.027), metabolic syndrome (MetS) (HR: 1.343; 95%CI: 1.051-1.716, p =0.019) or abdominal obesity (HR: 1.325; 95%CI: 1.048-1.674, p=0.019).
Conclusions: Liver fibrosis, as estimated by FIB-4, may serve as a more reliable prognostic indicator for diabetic patients than hepatic steatosis. Diabetes patients with an FIB-4 ≥1.3 without moderate-severe steatosis had a significantly increased all-cause mortality risk. These findings highlight the importance of identifying and monitoring those patients, as they may benefit from further evaluation and risk stratification.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. Population aging, macroeconomic changes, and global diabetes prevalence, 1990–2008;Sudharsanan N;Popul Health Metr,2015
2. Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015;GBD 2015 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators;Lancet,2016
3. Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4.4 million participants;NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC);Lancet,2016
4. Risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in individuals with diabetes mellitus, impaired fasting glucose, and impaired glucose tolerance: the Australian Diabetes, Obesity, and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab);Barr EL;Circulation,2007
5. The global epidemiology of NAFLD and NASH in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis;Younossi ZM;J Hepatol,2019