Using healthcare systems data for outcomes in clinical trials:  Issues to consider at the design stage

Author:

Toader Alice-Maria1ORCID,Campbell Marion K2,Quint Jennifer K3,Robling Michael4,Sydes Matthew R5,Thorn Joanna6,Wright-Hughes Alexandra7,Yu Ly-Mee8,Abbott Tom E.F.9,Bond Simon10,Caskey Fergus J6,Clout Madeleine6,Collinson Michelle7,Copsey Bethan7,Davies Gwyneth11,Driscoll Timothy12,Gamble Carrol1,Griffin Xavier L13,Hamborg Thomas14,Harris Jessica15,Harrison David A16,Harji Deena17,Henderson Emily J6,Logan Pip18,Love Sharon B19,Magee Laura A20,O'Brien Alastair21,Pufulete Maria22,Ramnarayan Padmanabhan23,Saratzis Athanasios24,Smith Jo25,Solis-Trapala Ivonne25,Stubbs Clive26,Farrin Amanda17,Williamson Paula27

Affiliation:

1. University of Liverpool

2. University of Aberdeen Health Services Research Unit

3. Imperial College London School of Public Health

4. Cardiff University Centre for Trials Research

5. MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL: Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London

6. University of Bristol Population Health Sciences

7. University of Leeds Clinical Trials Research Unit

8. University of Oxford Department of Primary Care Health Sciences: University of Oxford Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences

9. William Harvey Research Institute: Queen Mary University of London William Harvey Research Institute

10. Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit

11. UCL GOS Institute of Child Health: University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health

12. Swansea University

13. Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry Institute of Dentistry: Queen Mary University of London Institute of Dentistry

14. Queen Mary University of London Wolfson Institute of Population Health

15. University of Bristol

16. ICNARC: Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre

17. University of Leeds

18. University of Nottingham

19. MRC CTU at UCL: Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London

20. King's College London

21. UCL Institute for Liver & Digestive Health: University College London Institute for Liver and Digestive Health

22. University of Bristol Medical School

23. Imperial College London

24. University of Leicester

25. Keele University

26. BCTU: University of Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit

27. University of Liverpool School of Health Sciences

Abstract

Abstract Background Healthcare system data (HSD) are increasingly used in clinical trials, augmenting or replacing traditional methods of collecting outcome data. The PRIMORANT study set out to determine when HSD are of sufficient quality and utility to replace bespoke outcome data collection, a methodological question prioritised by the clinical trials community. Methods The PRIMORANT study had three phases. First, an initial workshop was held to scope the issues faced by trialists when considering whether to use HSDs for trial outcomes. Second, a consultation exercise was undertaken with clinical trials unit (CTU) staff, trialists, methodologists, clinicians, funding panels and data providers. Third, a final discussion workshop was held, at which the results of the consultation were fed back, case studies presented, and issues considered in small breakout groups. Results Key topics included in the consultation process were validity of outcome data, timeliness of data capture, internal pilots, data-sharing, practical issues, and decision-making. A majority of respondents (n = 78, 95%) considered the development of guidance for trialists to be feasible. Guidance was developed following the discussion workshop, for the five broad areas of terminology, feasibility, internal pilots, onward data sharing, and data archiving. Conclusions We provide guidance to inform decisions about whether or not to use HSDs for outcomes, and if so, to assist trialists in working with registries and other HSD-providers to improve the design and delivery of trials.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference19 articles.

1. Realising the full potential of data-enabled trials in the UK: a call for action;Sydes MR;BMJ open,2021

2. Access to routinely collected health data for clinical trials–review of successful data requests to UK registries;Lensen S;Trials,2020

3. Use of routinely collected data in a UK cohort of publicly funded randomised clinical trials;McKay AJ;F1000Research,2021

4. A DELPHI study priority setting the remaining challenges for the use of routinely collected data in trials: COMORANT-UK;Williams AD;Trials,2023

5. COMORANT-UK Consensus on methodological opportunities for routine data and trials. [Available from: https://www.cardiff.ac.uk/centre-for-trials-research/research/studies-and-trials/view/comorant-uk.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3