Affiliation:
1. Mercedes-Benz (Germany)
2. Leiden University
Abstract
Abstract
This survey provides an extensive overview of the state-of-the-art model-based online semi-supervised and unsupervised anomaly detection algorithms used on multivariate time series. It also outlines the most popular benchmark datasets used in literature, as well as a novel taxonomy where a distinction between online and offline, and training and inference is made. To achieve this, almost 50 peer-reviewed publications are surveyed and categorised into different model families to paint a clear picture of the anomaly detection landscape for the reader. Then, where possible, a comparison of the anomaly detection performance of the surveyed approaches is provided and the key research gaps are highlighted. It is concluded that few approaches propose any enhancements that involve the user feedback. In addition to that, transformer-based models seem to have found little application in anomaly detection so far, though this is most likely due to the novelty of the model type, not necessarily due to the lack of potential. Moreover, there is no standard benchmark procedure to assess anomaly detection performance. A variety of different datasets and evaluation metrics used for evaluation are used hence it is difficult to draw conclusions from comparisons between papers. Lastly, the rarity of approaches trained and inferred in an online manner is also pointed out, possibly explained by the lower performance compared to offline trained approaches.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference84 articles.
1. Munir, Mohsin and Chattha, Muhammad Ali and Dengel, Andreas and Ahmed, Sheraz (2019) {A Comparative Analysis of Traditional and Deep Learning-Based Anomaly Detection Methods for Streaming Data}. IEEE, Anomaly detection, Deep learning, Streaming data, 10.1109/ICMLA.2019.00105, 978-1-7281-4550-1, 561--566, 12, 18th IEEE International Conference On Machine Learning And Applications (ICMLA)
2. Nayak, Rashmiranjan and Pati, Umesh Chandra and Das, Santos Kumar (2021) {A comprehensive review on deep learning-based methods for video anomaly detection}. Image and Vision Computing 106: 104078 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imavis.2020.104078, Deep learning, Deep one-class models, Deep regenerative models, Hybrid models, Spatiotemporal models, Video anomaly detection, 02628856, Elsevier B.V., 2
3. Zhang, Chuxu and Song, Dongjin and Chen, Yuncong and Feng, Xinyang and Lumezanu, Cristian and Cheng, Wei and Ni, Jingchao and Zong, Bo and Chen, Haifeng and Chawla, Nitesh V. (2019) {A Deep Neural Network for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection and Diagnosis in Multivariate Time Series Data}. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 33: 1409--1416 https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33011409, 2374-3468, 9781577358091, 7
4. Park, Daehyung and Hoshi, Yuuna and Kemp, Charles C. (2018) {A Multimodal Anomaly Detector for Robot-Assisted Feeding Using an LSTM-Based Variational Autoencoder}. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 3(3): 1544--1551 https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2018.2801475, Failure detection and recovery, assistive robots, deep learning in robotics and automation, 2377-3766, IEEE, 7
5. Zhu, Guangxuan and Zhao, Hongbo and Liu, Haoqiang and Sun, Hua (2019) {A Novel LSTM-GAN Algorithm for Time Series Anomaly Detection}. IEEE, GAN, 10.1109/PHM-Qingdao46334.2019.8942842, 978-1-7281-0861-2, 1--6, 10, Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM-Qingdao)
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献