Treatment of Moderate and Severe Pelvic Organ Prolapse by Biomechanical Reconstruction: A Series of 135 patients

Author:

Wang Xingqi1,Yang Xunguo1,Lin Han1,Gao Zhenhua1,Zhang Quan1,Li Ling1,Tian Daoming1,Wen Yubin1,Chen Lihua1,Shen Jihong1

Affiliation:

1. The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University

Abstract

Abstract Objective To evaluate the efficacy of pelvic floor biomechanical reconstruction surgery in patients with moderate and severe pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Materials and methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 135 patients diagnosed with moderate and severe pelvic organ prolapse (POP) who underwent pelvic floor biomechanical reconstruction at the Urogynecology Department of The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University from January 2021 to May 2022. The procedure included anterior compartment mesh inlay, posterior colporrhaphy, and reconstruction of perineal body. Follow-up examinations were systematically performed at 3 months, 6 months and annually after the surgery. The primary outcomes assessed were objective and subjective cure rates, while the secondary outcomes included recurrence rate, reoperation rate, and complications. Anatomic evaluation was conducted using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q) and sonographic imaging of pelvic floor functional anatomy. Patient’s satisfaction was evaluated using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement Scale (PGI-I). Results All operations were successfully completed, with the exception of one case that experienced an intraoperative bladder injury. At a follow-up of 10.4 ± 3.3 months, out of the 135 patients evaluated, statistically significant improvements were observed in the POP-Q points compared to preoperative measurements at the 6-month, 1-year and 2-year time points (p < .001). Additionally, postoperatively, the Urethral Rotation Angle (URA), Restrovesical Angle (RVA), Levator Hiatus Area (LHA) at maximum Valsalva state, and Bladder Neck Descent (BND) were significantly lower than their preoperative values (p < .05). At 1 year 1.5% patients had mesh exposure, and the reoperation rate was 2.2%. More than 90% of patients expressed highly satisfaction with the surgical outcome. Conclusions Pelvic floor biomechanical reconstruction is a safe technique that has shown promising results and low complication rates. It may serve as a viable alternative to sacral hysteropexy for patients with POP.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference27 articles.

1. Pelvic Organ Prolapse;Iglesia CB;Am Fam Physician,2017

2. Raju R, Linder BJ. Evaluation and Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Mayo Clin Proc. 2021;96(12):3122-9.

3. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and its recurrence: a systematic review;Vergeldt TF;Int Urogynecol J,2015

4. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery and quality of life-a nationwide cohort study;Mattsson NK;Am J Obstet Gynecol,2020

5. The Anatomical Pathogenesis of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women;Yang X;Med (Kaunas),2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3