Effectiveness of Conservative Treatment in Patients with AOSpine Type A2 and A3 Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine Without Neurological Deficit: A Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study

Author:

Grin Andrey1ORCID,Pogonchenkova Irena2ORCID,Karanadze Vasiliy1ORCID,Lvov Ivan1ORCID,Talypov Aleksandr1ORCID,Kordonskiy Anton1ORCID,Abdrafiev Rinat1ORCID,Makarova Marina2ORCID,Filippov Maksim2ORCID,Manuilov Vadim2

Affiliation:

1. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine, Moscow, Russia

2. Moscow Scientific and Practical Center for Medical Rehabilitation, Restorative and Sports Medicine, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: One of the important yet unresolved questions is the choice between conservative and surgical treatment for compressive and burst fractures. Published prospective studies to date have provided contradictory evidence. Hitchon et al. demonstrate the relative superiority of conservative treatment in the long term, Siebenga et al. favor surgery, and Shen et al. suggest no difference. Currently, according to the clinicaltrials.gov database, only two active multicenter cohort studies are dedicated to this issue, and three more were terminated in the years following the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. This fact indicates the high relevance and active interest of the surgical community in this issue. Methods and analysis. This study is a prospective cohort study. All enrolled subjects will be divided into two concurrent groups based on the treatment technique applied. The main group (prospective) will consist of patients who underwent conservative therapy. The control group (historical control) will be comprised of patients who underwent surgery previously at the Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine. In total, 80 patients (40 per group) are planned to be enrolled in the study. The primary endpoint is the Oswestry Disability Index dynamics at the end of the 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes will be assessed using the SF-36 scale and EQ-5D-5L. Additional parameters will include sagittal balance of the spine, fusion results, total cost of treatment, and hospital stay over one year. Follow-up examinations will be performed at 3, 6, and 12 months. Ethics and dissemination. The current study will be conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of the World Medical Association. The provided protocol was approved by the local ethics committees of the Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine (Approval No. 5–23 20.09.2023) and the Moscow Scientific and Practical Center for Medical Rehabilitation, Restorative and Sports Medicine (Approval No. 7/1 16.10.2023). The preliminary and final results of the study will be presented in peer-reviewed neurosurgery and spinal journals and at relevant international conferences. Trial registration number NCT06059820

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference17 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3