Affiliation:
1. Instituto de Patologia da Coluna
2. The University of Mississippi
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), developed by Dr. Luiz Pimenta in 2006, allows access to the spinal column through the psoas major muscle. The technique has many advantages, such as reduced bone and muscular tissue damage, indirect decompression, larger implants, and lordosis correction capabilities. However, this technique also has drawbacks, with the most notorious being the risk of spinal pathologies due to indirect injury of the lumbar plexus, but with low rates of persistent injuries. Therefore, several groups have proposed classifications to help identify patients at a greater risk of presenting with neurological deficits. The present work aims to propose a new classification system that relies on the simple observation of easily identifiable key structures to guide lateral L4-L5 LLIF decision-making.
Methods: Patients aged > 18 years who underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included. This came to the office between 2022 and 2023, until 50 quality images were acquired. And excluded as follows: Anatomical changes in the vertebral body or major psoas muscles prevent the identification of key structures or poor-quality MRIs. Each anatomy was classified as type I, type II, or type III according to the consensus among the three observers.
Results: Fifty anatomical sites were included in this study. 64% of the L4-L5 anatomies were type I, 22% were type II, and 14% were type III. None of the type 3 L4-L5 anatomies was approached using a lateral technique.
Conclusion: The proposed classification is an easy and simple method for evaluating the feasibility of a lateral approach to L4–LL5.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference27 articles.
1. 1. Pimenta L, Tohmeh A, Jones D, et al.: Rational decision making in a wide scenario of different minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion approaches and devices. Journal of Spine Surgery. 2018, 4:142.
2. 2. Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, Seex K, Rao PJ: Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg. 2015, 1:2–18. 10.3978/j.issn.2414-469X.2015.10.05
3. 3. Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR: Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine Journal. 2006, 6:435–43. 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.08.012
4. 4. Ahmadian A, Deukmedjian AR, Abel N, Dakwar E, Uribe JS: Analysis of lumbar plexopathies and nerve injury after lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: Diagnostic standardization. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013, 18:289–97. 10.3171/2012.11.SPINE12755
5. 5. Lehmen JA, Gerber EJ: MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics. Eur Spine J. 2015, 24 Suppl 3:287–313. 10.1007/S00586-015-3886-1