Analysis of Patient flow through general medical wards at a Tertiary Academic Hospital

Author:

Hunter Mehreen1,Peters Shrikant1,Khumalo Nontuthuko2,Davies Mary-Ann1

Affiliation:

1. University of Cape Town

2. Groote Schuur Hospital

Abstract

Abstract Background The challenge of enhancing service delivery to meet the needs of a growing and aging population, whilst minimizing expense, is a global concern. There is an urgent need to understand and quantify systemic gaps in the efficient delivery of healthcare services. Movement of patients through a health establishment is a complex activity reliant upon multi-actor co-ordination across departments. Stagnation has negative impacts on both staff and patients by increasing risks of adverse outcomes, staff frustration and job dissatisfaction. An inefficient discharge process can be a significant barrier to timely patient movement. Discharge planning has been adopted in many high-income countries to ensure standardization and process efficiency. However, the heterogeneity of healthcare facilities and their challenges needs to be understood to implement targeted and effective discharge planning. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a central hospital in the Western Cape, South Africa to assess the journey of medical patients from admission to discharge. We reviewed the folders of eligible patients using a data-extraction tool to ascertain reasons for admission and barriers to timely discharge. Results Among 86 patient folders reviewed, cumulatively accounting for 596 in-patient days, a difference in the median length of in-patient stay between medical firms (p = 0.042) was noted. The shortest length of stay corresponded to firms with the greatest proportion of daily senior oversight (defined as documented patient reviews by a registrar, medical officer and/or consultant independently or in addition to reviews done for the day by interns and students). Firm 5 had a median length of stay of 5 days with 64% senior oversight and Firm 2 with the lowest senior oversight at 26% had amongst the longest lengths of stay at 8 days. While 52% of patients vacated their beds between 14:00 and 17:00, 66% of patients were admitted after 20:00. Reasons for prolonged admission were variable, and attributable to a range of different disciplines across the multidisciplinary team. Conclusion Delays in discharge were multi-factorial, highlighting the need for a standardized discharge process. Increasing senior oversight could assist in enhancing efficient patient movement.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference9 articles.

1. Hankey G, editor. Patient flow management in a South African academic hospital: the Groote Schuur Hospital (GSH) case2017.

2. An analysis of the concept of patient flow management;Benjamin E;Nurs Forum,2022

3. The three paradoxes of patient flow: an explanatory case study;Kreindler SA;BMC Health Serv Res,2017

4. Hospitalist and Internal Medicine Leaders' Perspectives of Early Discharge Challenges at Academic Medical Centers;Patel H;J Hosp Med,2018

5. Why are hospitalisations too long? A simple checklist for identifying the main social barriers to hospital discharge from a nephrology ward;Coindre JP;BMC Nephrol,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3