Comparative Analysis of Response Surface Methodology (Rsm) Method and Taguchi Method: Optimization Hydraulic Ram Pump Performance

Author:

Romelin Chahyani1,Zahedi Zahedi1,Nusantara Badai Charamsar1

Affiliation:

1. Universitas Sumatera Utara

Abstract

Abstract

Hydraulic ram pumps offer an energy-efficient solution for water lifting, crucial in rural areas with limited electricity access. Comparative analysis using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Taguchi method reveals distinct experimental designs and optimization outcomes. RSM entails 20 experiments, yielding optimal points at Input Height (3 m), Input Length (12 m), and Vacuum Tube Length (120 cm). In contrast, Taguchi employs 9 experiments, with optimal points at Input Height (3 m), Input Length (6 m), and Vacuum Tube Lenght (120 cm). For the equation model, the RSM method shows a complex mathematical equation involving interactions between variables, while the Taguchi method provides a simpler equation. As for the most optimal variable when viewed from the Significant value in both methods in the ANOVA table, it is found that the input height variable is the most significant variable in optimising the response (discharge). A better understanding of these two methods can help the selection of appropriate methods for specific situations, strengthen the understanding of hydram pump performance, and contribute to the development of more efficient and sustainable hydram pump technology.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3