Affiliation:
1. Taichung Veterans General Hospital
2. National Taipei University of Technology
3. National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The complexity of systemic variables and comorbidities make it difficult to determine the best treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It is impossible to perform a multidimensional evaluation of every patient, but guidelines based on analyses of said complexities would be the next best option. Traditional statistics are inadequate for developing predictive models with many variables; however, data mining is well-suited to the task.
Patients and Methods and finding: The clinical profiles and data of a total of 537 patients diagnosed with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stages B and C from 2009 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed using 4 decision-tree algorithms. 19 treatments, 7 biomarkers, and 4 states of hepatitis were tested to see which combinations would result in survival times greater than a year. 2 of the algorithms produced complete models through single trees, which made only them suitable for clinical judgement. A combination of alpha fetoprotein ≤ 210.5 mcg/L, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase ≤ 1.13 µkat/L, and total bilirubin ≤ 0.0283 mmol/L was shown to be a good predictor of survival > 1 year, and the most effective treatments for such patients were radio-frequency ablation (RFA) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with radiation therapy (RT). In patients without this combination, the best treatments were RFA, TACE with RT and targeted drug therapy, and TACE with targeted drug therapy and immunotherapy. The main limitation of this study was small sample. With small sample size, we may developed a less reliable model system, failing to produce any clinically important results or outcomes
Conclusion: Data mining can produce models to help clinicians predict survival time at the time of initial HCC diagnosis and then choose the most suitable treatment.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference32 articles.
1. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries;Sung H;CA: a cancer journal for clinicians,2021
2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2022;72(1):7–33.
3. Applicability of BCLC stage for prognostic stratification in comparison with other staging systems: single centre experience from long-term clinical outcomes of 1717 treatment-naïve patients with hepatocellular carcinoma;Kim BK;Liver International,2012
4. BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendation: The 2022 update;Reig M;Journal of Hepatology,2022
5. Comparative analysis of decision tree classification algorithms;Priyam A;International Journal of current engineering and technology,2013