What is the evidence for medical school applicants’ reasons for choosing medicine? A qualitative study

Author:

Kimura Shunsuke1,Tanemura Fumitaka2,Kodama Satoshi2,Nishigori Hiroshi3

Affiliation:

1. Machida Municipal Hospital

2. Kyoto University

3. Nagoya University

Abstract

Abstract Background It is important for medical school applicants and faculties to identify applicants’ reasons for choosing medicine as a career. Several studies suggest that there is a discrepancy between applicants’ real reasons for choosing medicine and those presented in entrance examinations. This discrepancy can be addressed in terms of evidence in which applicants identify reasons as their own. This study thus aims to explore applicants’ evidence for their real and stated reasons for choosing medicine. Methods The paradigm of this study is constructivism. We carried out individual semi-structured interviews with 15 medical students or physicians who had entered medical school through graduate-entry programs in Japan. In the interviews, we explored the participants’ real and stated reasons, including evidence for these reasons. We analyzed the data by conducting a reflexive thematic analysis on applicants’ evidence for their real and stated reasons. Results The thematic analysis on applicants’ evidence for their real reasons revealed six themes: (a) an idea since childhood or adolescence; (b) an episode of disease in one’s family or patient; (c) further development of one’s past major; (d) a comparison of the meaning and value of work; (e) an absence of evidence; and (f) an inability to identify one’s reasons or evidence. Moreover, the thematic analysis on applicants’ evidence for their stated reasons revealed four themes: (a) an episode of disease in one’s family or patient; (b) further development of one’s past major; (c) a comparison of the meaning and value of work; and (d) no explanations in the entrance examination. Conclusions This study clarified medical school applicants’ evidence for their real and stated reasons for choosing medicine as a career. The most important finding is the possibility that applicants may not even be able to justify their real reasons with evidence. Moreover, they can arbitrarily present their stated reasons and evidence for them in entrance examinations regardless of whether their real and stated reasons coincide. Medical faculties should reconsider why and how they ask applicants about their reasons for choosing medicine in the student selection process.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3