The Ethical Views of Turkish Researchers and the Ethics Committees on Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation

Author:

Tokaç Mahmut1,Yıldırım Erol2,Kaç Beyzanur3,Oğuz İbrahim Atıf4,Çelik Serra5,Hanoğlu Mine6,Aydın Fatma7,Otrar Mustafa8,Başpınar Adem9,Hanoğlu Lütfü10

Affiliation:

1. Department of History of Medicine and Ethics, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University

2. Department of Psychology, Istanbul Medipol University

3. History of Medicine and Ethics Graduate Program, Institute of Health Sciences, Istanbul Medipol University

4. School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University

5. Faculty of Medicine, Bezm-i Alem Vakıf University

6. Department of Anesthesiology, Nisa Medical Center

7. Health Sciences and Technologies Research Institute (SABİTA) - fINCAN Labs, Istanbul Medipol University

8. Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Kırklareli University

9. Department of Sociology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Kırklareli University

10. Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University

Abstract

Abstract Background: Clinical and research use of transcranial magnetic and direct current stimulation are becoming more common in Turkey. However, the opinions of the researchers and ethics committees about the ethical dimension of the issue differ. The aim of this study is to examine the ethical views of the researchers and committees and to review the legal procedures of the clinical and research NIBS applications in Turkey. Methods: The data were collected from researchers working with NIBS, ethics committee representatives and official regulatory agency. The surveys prepared by researchers were sent to them, and an interview was conducted with the TİTCK-KAD representative. Quantitative analysis was performed for multiple-choice and short-answer questions, while thematic analysis was performed for open-ended answers. Results: In the first survey, 99 researchers with a mean age of 38.9±10.5 years and most of them being female (65.65%) participated. 44.4% of the researchers were medical doctors, 21.21% were psychologists, 24.24% were other health professionals (mostly physiotherapists), and 10.10% were from other fields (engineers, educators, etc.). 94% of the researchers stated that the NIBS practitioner should undergo a standardized training. Different rates were obtained in the items related to the effectiveness of NIBS, self-administration, ethical and legal issues. It appeared that 94.37% of the researchers applied to the Clinical Research Ethics Committees in Turkey. Conclusion: Researchers in Turkey agree on the clinical use and efficacy of NIBS. However, when it comes to improving cognitive and physical performance in healthy people, they are largely hesitant both in terms of efficacy and morality. This attitude is very similar to that of other researchers around the world. In terms of ethics committees, it is observed that local ethics committees are not sufficiently aware of the issue and that there are some differences in practice.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3