Do Infants Expect Reciprocity Between Strangers?

Author:

Jin Kyong-sun1ORCID,Ting Fransisca2,He Zijing3ORCID,Baillargeon Renee4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Sungshin Women's University

2. University of Toronto

3. Sun Yat-sen University

4. University of Illinois

Abstract

Abstract Social scientists from different disciplines have long argued that direct reciprocity plays an important role in regulating social interactions between unrelated individuals. Here we examined whether 15-month-old infants (N = 160) would expect direct positive and negative reciprocity between strangers. In violation-of-expectation experiments, infants watched successive interactions between two strangers, agent1 and agent2. After agent1 acted positively toward agent2, infants were surprised if agent2 acted negatively toward agent1 in a new context. Similarly, after agent1 acted negatively toward agent2, infants were surprised if agent2 acted positively toward agent1 in a new context. Both responses were eliminated when agent2’s actions were not knowingly directed at agent1. Additional results indicated that infants viewed it as acceptable for agent2 to either respond in kind to agent1 or not engage with her further. By 15 months of age, infants thus already expect a modicum of reciprocity between strangers: Initial positive or negative actions are expected to set broad limits on reciprocal actions. This research adds weight to long-standing claims that direct reciprocity helps regulate interactions between unrelated individuals and, as such, is likely to depend on psychological systems that have evolved to support reciprocal reasoning and behavior.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference80 articles.

1. Baillargeon R et al (2015) Psychological and sociomoral reasoning in infancy. APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology, Volume 1: Attitudes and Social Cognition, ed Borgida E, Bargh J (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC), pp 79–150

2. Ting F, Buyukozer Dawkins M, Stavans M, Baillargeon R (2020) Principles and concepts in early moral cognition. The Social Brain. ed. Decety J (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), pp 41–65

3. The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate?;Brewer MB;J Soc Issues,1999

4. Egalitarian motives in humans;Dawes CT;Nature,2007

5. Normative foundations of human cooperation;Fehr E;Nat Hum Behav,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3