Affiliation:
1. North Carolina A&T: North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University
2. North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University
3. North Carolina A&T State University: North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University
Abstract
Abstract
Ni/SBA-15 meso-structured catalysts modified with Chromium and CeO2 (Ni-Cr-CeO2/SBA-15) were utilized to produce hydrogen from glycerol steam reforming (GSR). The catalysts were synthesized by a one-pot hydrothermal process and extensively characterized by analytical techniques such as N2 adsorption-desorption (BET), H2-temperature programmed reduction (H2-TPR), powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), Inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES), and Transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Overall, the Ni-based catalysts exhibited higher glycerol conversion − 12Ni-SBA-15-99.9%, 12Ni3CeO2-SBA-15-89.4% and 8Ni4Cr3CeO2-SBA-15-99.7%. Monometallic 12Ni/SBA-15 performed exceptionally well, while 12Cr/SBA-15 performed poorly with the highest 71.48% CO selectivity. For short-term GSR reactions, CeO2 addition to 12Ni/SBA-15 did not have any effect, whereas Cr addition resulted in 32% decrease in H2 selectivity. The long-term stability studies of 12Ni-SBA-15 showed H2 selectivity of ~ 64% and ~ 98% glycerol conversion. However, its activity was short-lived. After 20-30hrs, the H2 selectivity and conversion dropped precipitously to 40%. The doping of mesoporous Ni/SBA-15 with Cr and CeO2 remarkably enhanced the long-term stability of the catalyst for 12Ni3CeO2-SBA-15, and 8Ni4Cr3CeO2-SBA-15 catalyst with ~ 58% H2 selectivity and ~ 100% conversion for the entire 60hrs. Nonetheless, Cr and CeO2 seem to improve the shelf-life of Ni-SBA-15 via different mechanistic pathways. CeO2 mitigated Ni poisoning through coke oxidation whereas Cr bolstered the catalyst stability via maintaining a well-defined pore size and structural integrity of the heterogeneous framework, thereby restricting structural collapse, and hence reducing sintering of the Ni active sites during the long-term 60hrs continuous reaction.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference67 articles.
1. Abrokwah RY, Dade W, Deshmane V, Rahman M, Kuila D (2019) Effects of Mesoporous Supports and Metals on Steam Reforming of Alcohols. Fuel Processing and Energy Utilization. Chapman and Hall/CRC, pp 93–108
2. Comparative performance of M-MCM-41 (M: Cu, Co, Ni, Pd, Zn and Sn) catalysts for steam reforming of methanol;Abrokwah RY;J Mol Catal A Chem,2016
3. A comparative thermodynamic and experimental analysis on hydrogen production by steam reforming of glycerin;Adhikari S;Energ Fuel,2007
4. Renewable hydrogen from glycerol steam reforming using Co–Ni–MgO based SBA-15 nanocatalysts;Al-Salihi S;Int J Hydrogen Energy,2020
5. Corrosion protection of magnesium alloys by cerium, zirconium and niobium-based conversion coatings;Ardelean H;Corros Sci,2008