Affiliation:
1. University of Hong Kong
2. Monash University
3. University of California, Berkeley
4. California Polytechnic State University
Abstract
Abstract
Was the rapid increase and collapse of commodity prices in 2007–2009 passed through to supermarket prices symmetrically? This study is the first to address this issue for an everyday-low-price (EDLP) supermarket chain, which infrequently changes its prices and rarely has sales. We also reexamine the question for typical firms that set a usual high price and have frequent sales. We examine 25 goods that use a primary commodity (such as rice in a bag of rice). We fail to reject symmetric adjustments for very few goods for both types of stores. In addition, we find that the probability an EDLP chain adjusts its prices in response to even a large commodity price shock is low for most goods.
JEL: D40, Q13, C22
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference69 articles.
1. Spatial price transmission and asymmetry in the Ghanaian maize market;Abdulai A;Journal of Development Economics,2000
2. Optimal price setting with observation and menu costs;Alvarez FE;Quarterly Journal of Economics,2011
3. Rockets and feathers revisited: Asymmetric retail gasoline pricing in the era of market transparency;Asane-Otoo E;Energy Journal,2022
4. Asymmetry and rigidity in farm-retail price transmission;Azzam AM;American Journal of Agricultural Economics,1999
5. Rockets and feathers: The asymmetric speed of adjustment of UK retail gasoline prices to cost changes;Bacon RW;Energy Economics,1991