Affiliation:
1. Nanjing First Hospital
Abstract
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
Endoscopic vein harvesting (EVH) is an alternative technique to obtain the saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. We aimed to evaluate the early and mid-term outcomes of patients with EVH in CABG.
METHODS
This cohort study included consecutive isolated CABG patients in Nanjing First Hospital from July 2020 to December 2022 using propensity score matching methods. Patients were classified to EVH group and open vein harvesting (OVH) group according to the vein harvesting methods. The primary outcome was the all-cause death, and the secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) including cardiovascular death, heart failure, myocardial infarction and revascularization and asymptomatic survival in the follow-up.
RESULTS
Totally 1247 patients were included in the study with 849 in OVH group and 398 in EVH group. Patients with EVH were more female, diabetes, higher body mass index, more multi-vessel and left main diseases. 308 pairs were formed after the matching. There was no significant difference in the rates of in-hospital death (EVH vs. OVH, 2.3% vs. 1.3%, P = 0.543). During the 3 years follow-up, EVH grafts were considered not inferior to OVH grafts, no differences were found in all-cause death [8.5% vs. 5.0%, hazard ratio (HR) 1.565, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.77–3.17, P = 0.21], MACEs (8.1% vs. 7.1%, HR 1.165, 95CI: 0.51–2.69, P = 0.71) and asymptomatic survival (66.7% vs. 72.5%, HR 1.117, 95%CI: 0.65–1.92, P = 0.68).
CONCLUSIONS
EVH grafts were considered comparable to OVH grafts in patients following CABG in the 3 years follow-up.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference23 articles.
1. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines[J];Lawton JS
2. Trends of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Performance in a Cohort of Hospitals in China Between 2013 and 2018[J];Li X;Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2021
3. Leg wound infection after coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis comparing minimally invasive versus conventional vein harvesting[J];Athanasiou T;Ann Thorac Surg 2003
4. A meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus traditional open vein harvest technique for coronary artery bypass graft surgery[J];Markar SR;Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg,2010
5. Ferdinand FD, Macdonald JK, Balkhy HH et al. Endoscopic Conduit Harvest in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery: An ISMICS Systematic Review and Consensus Conference Statements[J]. Innovations (Phila),2017,12(5):301–319.