Preference of Healthcare App Selection Among Physicians, Chronic Patients, and the Healthy Individuals: A Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis

Author:

Shin Jaeyong1ORCID,Lee Junbok2ORCID,Kim Junghyun3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Yonsei University College of Medicine

2. Yonsei University

3. Yonsei Univerity

Abstract

Abstract Background: Owing to the rapid proliferation of healthcare applications (apps), consumers find it challenging to determine which apps suit their needs best. The Korean government introduced a certification program in 2022 to ensure the safety of health service apps, similar to several countries that have sought to guide and protect users. Objective: This study aims to identify the factors influencing the choice of healthcare service apps among physicians, chronic patients, and healthy individuals. Methods: We conducted a choice-based conjoint analysis with six factors (Number of studies on effectiveness, Frequency of delivering information, Cybersecurity and data safety, User satisfaction, Stamp of approval, Costs). A total of 1093 people (97 physicians, 589 chronic patients, and 407 healthy individuals) participated in the online survey. Result: Across all groups, cybersecurity and data safety were the most important preference factors (Chronic patients: β=0.795, CI 95% CI 0.750–0.840, Healthy individuals: β=1.127, CI 95% CI 1.066–1.188, Physicians: β=0.560, CI 95% CI 0.459–0.662). All groups were more willing to pay approximately $6 for cybersecurity and data safety and approximately $5 for certification. Conclusion: Digital healthcare technology will continue to evolve, and more healthcare apps are expected to be developed. For the effective use of these services, it is imperative to check user preferences. Governments that manage and authorize these services also need to implement policies based on the needs of users and providers.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference40 articles.

1. Moses, J. C. et al. Application of smartphone technologies in disease monitoring: a systematic review. In Healthcare 889 (MDPI, 2021).

2. A review of the quality and impact of mobile health apps;Grundy Q;Annual review of public health,2022

3. Exploring benefits and ethical challenges in the rise of mHealth (mobile healthcare) technology for the common good: An analysis of mobile applications for health specialists;Galetsi P;Technovation,2023

4. Theme trends and knowledge structure on mobile health apps: Bibliometric analysis;Peng C;JMIR mHealth and uHealth,2020

5. Smartphone users’ persuasion knowledge in the context of consumer mHealth apps: qualitative study;Joo E;JMIR mHealth and uHealth,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3