Affiliation:
1. Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Although many genome-wide association studies(GWAS) have confirmed the associations between multiple sites in the TERT-CLPTM1L region and lung cancer(LC) susceptibility in different populations, some of them haven’t found the associations between these sites and LC. The purpose of this study is to clarify the associations between TERT-CLPTM1L polymorphism and LC, as well as the differences in these associations between patients of different ethnicities and different LC subtypes.
Methods: Relevant literatures published before May 7, 2022 on ‘TERT-CLPTM1L polymorphisms and LC susceptibility’ in PubMed, EMbase,Web of Science, MEDLINE databases were searched through the Internet. Statistical analysis of data was performed in Revman5.3 software, including drawing forest plots, funnel plots and so on. Sensitivity and publication bias analysis were performed in Stata 14.0 software. TSA 0.9.5.10 software was performed for the Trial sequential analysis(TSA) tests to evaluate the stability of the results. Registration number: CRD42023407890.
Results: A total of 51 literatures were included in this meta-analysis, including 6 TERT-CLPTM1L polymorphisms and a total of 54 studies (12 GWAS and 42 case-control studies), including 11 studies in Caucasians and 43 studies in Asians.
The results showed that the minor allele variants of the 6 polymorphisms were positively or negatively associated with the risk of LC (rs2736098[T]: [OR]=1.24, 95% CI [1.18, 1.31]; rs2736100[C]: [OR]=1.25, 95% CI [1.20, 1.30]; rs31489[A]: [OR]=0.87, 95% CI [0.82, 0.92]; rs401681[T]: [OR]=0.87, 95% CI [0.84, 0.90]; rs402710[T]: [OR]=0.86, 95% CI [0.83, 0.88]; rs4975616[G]: [OR]=0.86, 95% CI [0.82, 0.91]). However, there were clear differences in these associations in LC with different pathological subtypes in Caucasian and Asian populations (Subgroup differences: I2≥50%).
Conclusions: Our results confirmed the clear associations between 6 TERT-CLPTM1L polymorphisms and the risk of LC, and there were significant differences in these associations among different ethnicities/pathological subtypes of LC.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference110 articles.
1. 1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:7–34.
2. 2. Moolgavkar SH, Holford TR, Levy DT, et al. Impact of reduced tobacco smoking on lung cancer mortality in the United States during 1975–2000. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:541-8.
3. 3. Bosse Y, Amos CI. A decade of GWAS results in lung cancer. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology 2017.
4. 4. Wang J, Liu Q, Yuan S, et al. Genetic predisposition to lung cancer: comprehensive literature integration, meta-analysis, and multiple evidence assessment of candidate-gene association studies. Sci Rep. 2017;21:8371.
5. 5. McKay JD, Hung RJ, Gaborieau V et al. Lung cancer susceptibility locus at 5p15.33. Nature genetics 2008;40(12):1404–1406.