Contextualizing the Job Demands-Resources Model across Healthcare Workers: A Cross-sectional Study of the Psychosocial Work Environment in Healthcare

Author:

Gynning Britta Elsert1ORCID,Karlsson Elin2,Teoh Kevin3,Gustavsson Per1,Christansen Filip1,Brulin Emma1

Affiliation:

1. Karolinska Institute: Karolinska Institutet

2. Linköping University: Linkopings universitet

3. Birkbeck College: Birkbeck University of London

Abstract

Abstract Background The deteriorating psychosocial work environment among healthcare workers in Sweden, influenced by demanding working conditions and resource constraints, affects individual well-being and patient care quality. Healthcare workers, including physicians, registered nurses, and assistant nurses, often work interdependently and share workplaces yet are three completely different professions. Nonetheless, comprehensive studies comparing their psychosocial work environments are scarce; often focusing on healthcare workers either separately or as a homogenous group, but rarely comparative. Aim Utilizing the Job Demands-Resources model this study investigated variations in the psychosocial work environment among Swedish healthcare workers. We wanted to identify how the antecedents of individual well-being, in the form of demands and resources, differed between healthcare workers. Method Data from the 2022 Longitudinal Occupational Health Survey for Health Care Professionals in Sweden were analysed; the participants included 7589 physicians, registered nurses, and assistant nurses. The analysis involved descriptive statistics, including measures of means and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), employing the Bonferroni correction for multiple post hoc comparisons. The ANCOVA was also stratified by working factors, including years of work experience and employment within the private/public sector. Results The study revealed significant variations in how healthcare workers perceive their psychosocial work environment. Physicians faced the highest level of Quantitative Demands (Mean (x̄) 3.15; 95% CI: 3.11–3.19), while registered nurses reported the most Emotional Demands (x̄ 3.37; 95% CI: 3.32–3.41). Assistant nurses had the highest grand means for the imbalance between Efforts and Rewards (Effort Reward Imbalance) (x̄ 1.49; 95% CI: 1.49–1.49) and an imbalance between Work and Private Life (Work-Life Interference) (x̄ 3.20, 95% CI: 3.15–3.25), along with limited resources. The stratified analysis showed that years of experience and the sector affected healthcare workers' perceptions of their psychosocial working environment. For example, registered nurses working in the private sector reported better working conditions than nurses working in the public sector. The situation for assistant nurses was reversed. Conclusion Differentive psychosocial work environments are experienced differently both between and within different healthcare occupations in Sweden. This study provides crucial insights for improving workplace conditions and consequently enhancing healthcare professionals’ well-being and quality of patient care.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3