Psychophysiological effects of walking in forests and urban built environments with disparate road traffic noise exposure: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial

Author:

Schaupp Julia1,Hediger Karin2,Wunderli Jean-Marc3,Schäffer Beat3,Tobias Silvia1,Kolecka Natalia1,Bauer Nicole1

Affiliation:

1. Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL)

2. University of Basel

3. Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology

Abstract

Abstract

Background Stress is a widespread phenomenon and reality of everyday life, entailing negative consequences for physical and psychological wellbeing. Previous studies have indicated that exposure to greenspaces and nature-based interventions are promising approaches to reducing stress and promoting restoration. However, an increasing percentage of the population lives in urban regions with limited opportunities to spend time in greenspaces. In addition, urban settings typically feature increased levels of noise, which represents a major environmental stressor. Although various studies have compared the effects of exposure to greenspaces versus urban built environments, evidence of the effects of noise in this context is very limited. Psychophysiological benefits of exposure to greenspaces compared to urban built environments reported in earlier studies might be less (or at least not only) due to features of the greenspaces than to additional stressors, such as road traffic noise in the urban built environment. Hence, differences in the effects attributed to greenness in previous studies may also be due to potentially detrimental noise effects in comparison settings. This paper reports the study protocol for a randomized, controlled intervention study comparing the effects of walking in forest versus urban built environments, taking road traffic noise exposure during walks in the respective settings into account. Methods The protocol envisages a field study employing a pretest-posttest design to compare the effects of 30-minute walks in urban built environments and forests with different road traffic noise levels. Assessments will consist of self-reported measures, physiological data (salivary cortisol and skin conductance), an attention test, and noise, as well as greenness measurements. The outcomes will be restoration, stress, positive and negative affect, attention, rumination, and nature connectedness. Discussion The results will inform about the restorative effect of walking in general, of exposure to different types of environments, and to different noise levels in these sites. The study will provide insights into the benefits of walking and nature-based interventions, taking into account the potential detrimental effects of noise exposure. It will thus facilitate a better understanding of low-threshold interventions to prevent stress and foster wellbeing. Trial registration: ISRCTN48943261, https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN48943261; Registered 23.11.2023.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference107 articles.

1. Swiss Federal Statistical Office. Arbeitsbedingungen und Gesundheitszustand, 2012–2017: Schweizerische Gesundheitsbefragung (SGB) [Work conditions and health status, 2012–2017: Swiss Health Survey]. 2019. https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/en/home/statistics/catalogues-databases.assetdetail.9366230.html. Accessed 15 Dec 2022.

2. Swiss Federal Statistical Office. Stress und psychosoziale Risiken am Arbeitsplatz haben 2017 zugenommen [Stress and psychosocial risks increased in working life in 2017]. 2019. https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/en/home/statistics/catalogues-databases.assetdetail.9366231.html. Accessed 5 Jan 2023.

3. Disentangling the Links Between Psychosocial Stress and Cardiovascular Disease;Osborne MT;Circ Cardiovasc Imaging,2020

4. Psychosocial Risk Factors and Cardiovascular Disease and Death in a Population-Based Cohort From 21 Low-, Middle-, and High-Income Countries;Santosa A;JAMA Netw Open,2021

5. Stress and cardiovascular disease;Steptoe A;Nat Rev Cardiol,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3