Continuing Medical Education in China: Evidence from primary health workers' preferences for continuing Traditional Chinese Medicine education

Author:

Yan Hao1,Han Zhaoran1,Nie Hanlin1,Yang Wanjin1,Nicholas Stephen2,Maitland Elizabeth3,Zhao Weihan1,Yang Yong4,Shi Xuefeng1

Affiliation:

1. Beijing University of Chinese Medicine

2. Australian National Institute of Management and Commerce

3. University of Liverpool Management School, University of Liverpool

4. West China Hospital of Sichuan University

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundContinuing Medical Education (CME) is an important part of the training process for health workers worldwide. In China, training in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) not only improves the expertise of medical workers, but also supports the Chinese Government’s policy of promoting TCM as an equal treatment to western medicine. CME, including learning Traditional Chinese Medicine Technologies (TCMTs), perform poorly and research into the motivation of health workers to engage in CME is urgently required. Using a discrete choice experiment, this study assessed the CME learning preferences of primary health workers, using TCMT as a case study of CME programs.MethodsWe conducted a discrete choice experiment among health workers in Shandong Province, Guizhou Province, and Henan provinces from July 1, 2021 to October 1, 2022 on the TCMT learning preferences of primary health workers. The mixed logit model and latent class analysis model were used to analyze primary health workers’ TCMT learning preferences.ResultsA total of 1,063 respondents participated in this study, of which 1,001 (94.2%) passed the consistency test and formed the final sample. Our key finding was that there was three distinct classes of TCMT learner. Overall, the relative importance of the seven attributes impacting the learning of TCMTs was: learning expenses, expected TCMT efficacy, TCMT learning difficulty, TCMT mode of learning, TCMT type, time required to learn, and expected frequency of TCMT use. However, these attributes differed significantly across the three distinct classes of TCMT learner. Infrequent users (class 1) were concerned with learning expenses and learning difficulty; workaholics (class 2) focused on the mode of learning; and pragmatists (class 3) paid more attention to the expected TCMTC efficacy and the expected frequency of TCMT use. We recommend targeted strategies to motivate TCMT learning suited to the requirements of each class of TCMT learner.ConclusionRather than a single TCMT medical education program for primary health workers, CME programs should be targeted at different classes of TCMT learner.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference48 articles.

1. Medical education in the United States of America;Dezee KJ;Med Teach,2012

2. Zavlin D, Jubbal KT, Noé JG, Gansbacher B. A comparison of medical education in Germany and the United States: from applying to medical school to the beginnings of residency. German medical science: GMS e-journal. 2017;15:Doc15.

3. Medical education in China: progress in the past 70 years and a vision for the future;Wang W;BMC Med Educ,2021

4. Reforming the continuing medical education system;Nissen SE;JAMA,2015

5. AMEE Guide No. 25: The assessment of learning outcomes for the competent and reflective physician;Shumway JM;Med Teach,2003

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3