Risk Factors of Unintentional Piecemeal Resection in Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Colorectal Polyps ≥ 10 mm

Author:

Ishikawa Tsubasa1,Okimoto Kenichiro1,Matsumura Tomoaki1,Ogasawara Sadahisa1,Fukuda Yoshihiro2,Kitsukawa Yoshio3,Yokoyama Yuya4,Kanayama Kengo1,Akizue Naoki1,Iino Yotaro5,Ohta Yuki1,Ishigami Hideaki6,Taida Takashi1,Tsuchiya Shin7,Saito Keiko1,Kamezaki Hidehiro8,Kobayashi Akitoshi9,Kikuchi Yasuharu10,Tada Minoru11,Shiko Yuki12,Ozawa Yoshihito12,Kato Jun1,Yamaguchi Taketo7,Kato Naoya1

Affiliation:

1. Chiba University

2. Seikei-kai Chiba Medical Center

3. Chiba Municipal Aoba Hospital

4. Chibaken Saiseikai Narashino Hospital

5. Kimitsu Chuo Hospital

6. Chiba Rosai Hospital

7. Funabashi Central Hospital

8. Eastern Chiba Medical Center

9. Funabashi Municipal Medical Center

10. Numazu City Hospital

11. National Hospital Organization Chiba Medical Center

12. Chiba University Hospital

Abstract

Abstract This study aimed to investigate the lesion and endoscopist factors associated with unintentional endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (uniEPMR) of colorectal lesions ≥ 10 mm. uniEPMR was defined from the medical record as anything other than a preoperatively planned EPMR. Factors leading to uniEPMR were identified by retrospective univariate and multivariate analyses of lesions ≥ 10 mm (adenoma and carcinoma) that were treated with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) at three hospitals. Additionally, a questionnaire survey was conducted to determine the number of cases treated by each endoscopist. A learning curve (LC) was created for each lesion size based on the number of experienced cases and the percentage of uniEPMR. Of 2557 lesions, 327 lesions underwent uniEPMR. Multivariate analysis showed that lesion diameter ≥ 30 mm (odds ratio 11.83, 95% confidence interval 6.80–20.60, p < .0001) was the most associated risk factor leading to uniEPMR. In the LC analysis, the proportion of uniEPMR decreased for lesion sizes of 10–19 mm until 160 cases. The proportion of uniEPMR decreased with the number of experienced cases in the 20–29 mm range, while there was no correlation between the number of experienced cases and the proportion of uniEPMR ≥ 30 mm. These results suggest that 160 cases seem to be the minimum number of cases needed to be proficient in en bloc EMR. Additionally, while lesion sizes of 10–29 mm are considered suitable for EMR, lesion sizes ≥ 30 mm are not applicable for en bloc EMR from the perspective of both lesion and endoscopist factors.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference30 articles.

1. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA;Bray F;Cancer J Clin,2018

2. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup;Winawer SJ;N Engl J Med,1993

3. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths;Zauber AG;N Engl J Med,2012

4. Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C, et al. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 49, 270 – 97 (2017).

5. JGES guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection;Tanaka S;Dig Endosc,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3