Sexual and Gender-Based Violence victims’ satisfaction of the support services through the holistic model of care in the Democratic Republic of Congo

Author:

Mugisho Gilbert M.1,Maroyi Raha1,Nabami Solange2,Kasherwa Amani C.3,Bitenga Ali4,Mukwege Denis1

Affiliation:

1. Université Evangélique en Afrique (UEA), The Democratic Republic of Congo

2. Médecins du Monde

3. UNSW Sydney

4. International Center for Advanced Research and Training (ICART), The Democratic Republic of Congo

Abstract

Abstract Background The quality-of-care assessment is an important indicator of the efficiency of a healthcare system. In the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), despite the implementation of the holistic care model for the treatment of sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) victims, little is known about the client’s perception of this model and its outcome. This study aimed to examine the expected and perceived satisfaction of service recipients through the One-Stop-Center model of health care in eastern DRC. Methodology This descriptive and analytical cross-sectional study was conducted at Panzi Hospital (PH), in eastern DRC. Data were collected by a mixed-methods approach, 64 Victims of Sexual Violence (VSVs) participated in individual (in-depth) interviews and 150 completed the Survey. Results The findings from our qualitative analysis demonstrated that the VSVs admitted at PH had various expectations and needs on arrival depending on their social identity and residence locations. For instance, the VSVs coming from remote areas with ongoing armed conflicts mentioned concerns related to their security in the post-treatment period and the risks of re-victimization that this could incur. Conversely, those who came from the urban neighborhood, with relative security raised various concerns related to their legal reparation and ongoing access to other support services. Based on their origins, the result from the quantitative analysis demonstrated the overall satisfaction of the client with the support services, 86% (p<10%) mentioned their satisfaction with the home visiting or follow-up of the support workers during and after the treatment and 88% (p<10%) of respondents mentioned the social support received both at the hospital and in their communities. In relation to the holistic care model, 89 % (p<5%) of clients mentioned that the healthcare services they received from the PH exceeded their expectations and wished that PH could continue supporting them mentally and financially for an effective reintegration into their communities. Conclusions Results of this study suggest that victims’ satisfaction with support services is based on either the organizational frameworks of clinical or support services within the hospital and the victims’ social environment.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference44 articles.

1. What prevents midwifery quality care in Bangladesh? A focus group enquiry with midwifery students;Bogren M;BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug

2. Parameswaran SG, Spaeth-Rublee B, Pincus HA. Measuring the Quality of Mental Health Care: Consensus Perspectives from Selected Industrialized Countries. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2015 May 1;42(3):288–95.

3. OECD, World Health Organization. Improving Healthcare Quality in Europe: Characteristics, Effectiveness and Implementation of Different Strategies [Internet]. OECD; 2019 [cited 2022 Jul 3]. Available from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/improving-healthcare-quality-in-europe_b11a6e8f-en

4. de Bienassis K, Kristensen S, Hewlett E, Roe D, Mainz J, Klazinga N. Measuring patient voice matters: setting the scene for patient-reported indicators. Int J Qual Health Care. 2022 Apr 1;34(Supplement_1):ii3–6.

5. de Bienassis K, Kristensen S, Hewlett E, Roe D, Mainz J, Klazinga N. Patient-reported indicators in mental health care: towards international standards among members of the OECD. Int J Qual Health Care. 2022 Apr 1;34(Supplement_1):ii7–12.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3