Evaluating the performance of Plasmodium falciparum genetics for inferring National Malaria Control Program reported incidence in Senegal
Author:
Wong Wesley1, Schaffner Stephen F.2, Thwing Julie3, Seck Mame Cheikh4, Gomis Jules4, Diedhiou Younouss4, Sy Ngayo5, Ndiop Medoune6, Ba Fatou6, Diallo Ibrahima4, Sene Doudou6, Diallo Mamadou Alpha4, Ndiaye Yaye Die4, Sy Mouhamad4, Sene Aita4, Sow Djiby4, Dieye Baba4, Tine Abdoulaye4, Ribado Jessica7, Suresh Joshua7, Lee Albert7, Battle Katherine E.7, Proctor Joshua L7, Bever Caitlin A7, MacInnis Bronwyn2, Ndiaye Daouda4, Hartl Daniel L.8, Wirth Dyann F1, Volkman Sarah K1
Affiliation:
1. Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health 2. The Broad Institute 3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 4. Centre International de recherche, de formation en Genomique Appliquee et de Surveillance Sanitaire (CIGASS) 5. Section de Lutte Anti-Parasitaire (SLAP) Clinic 6. Programme National de Lutte Contre le Paludisme 7. Institute for Disease Modeling, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation 8. Harvard University
Abstract
Abstract
Genetic surveillance of the Plasmodium falciparum parasite shows great promise for helping National Malaria Control Programs (NMCPs) assess parasite transmission. Genetic metrics such as the frequency of polygenomic (multiple strain) infections, genetic clones, and the complexity of infection (COI, number of strains per infection) are correlated with transmission intensity. However, despite these correlations, it is unclear whether genetic metrics alone are sufficient to estimate clinical incidence. Here, we examined parasites from 3,147 clinical infections sampled between the years 2012–2020 through passive case detection (PCD) across 16 clinic sites spread throughout Senegal. Samples were genotyped with a 24 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) molecular barcode that detects parasite strains, distinguishes polygenomic (multiple strain) from monogenomic (single strain) infections, and identifies clonal infections. To determine whether genetic signals can predict incidence, we constructed a series of Poisson generalized linear mixed-effects models to predict the incidence level at each clinical site from a set of genetic metrics designed to measure parasite clonality, superinfection, and co-transmission rates. We compared the model-predicted incidence with the reported standard incidence data determined by the NMCP for each clinic and found that parasite genetic metrics generally correlated with reported incidence, with departures from expected values at very low annual incidence (<10/1000/annual [‰]). When transmission is greater than 10 cases per 1000 annual parasite incidence (annual incidence >10 ‰), parasite genetics can be used to accurately infer incidence and is consistent with superinfection-based hypotheses of malaria transmission. When transmission was <10 ‰, we found that many of the correlations between parasite genetics and incidence were reversed, which we hypothesize reflects the disproportionate impact of importation and focal transmission on parasite genetics when local transmission levels are low.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference40 articles.
1. Stockdale JE, Liu P, Colijn C. The potential of genomics for infectious disease forecasting. Nature Microbiology 2022 7:11 7, 1736–1743 (2022). 2. Epidemiological inference from pathogen genomes: A review of phylodynamic models and applications;Featherstone LA;Virus Evol,2022 3. Phylodynamic applications in 21st century global infectious disease research;Rife BD;Glob Health Res Policy,2017 4. BEAST 2: A Software Platform for Bayesian Evolutionary Analysis;Bouckaert R;PLoS Comput Biol,2014 5. Tegally H et al. Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron lineages BA.4 and BA.5 in South Africa. Nature Medicine 2022 28:9 28, 1785–1790 (2022).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|