Affiliation:
1. University of Oslo
2. Zero Emissions Resource Organisation
3. Wroclaw University of Economics and Business
4. Centre for Civil Rights and Democracy Research
Abstract
Abstract
Background
One of the potential dimensions on which exclusion and injustice may occur in energy transitions is age. That age-based pattern of exclusion – ageism – has recently been conceptualized in the context of decarbonization as energy ageism. This paper offers a comparative empirical analysis of the impact of energy poverty as well as the senior citizens’ outlook towards an imminent energy transition in two European states: Norway and Poland.
Results
Drawing on interviews and focus groups with Polish and Norwegian seniors, we present the differences and similarities between the two countries, and the determinants of energy ageism, as well as the concept’s overall applicability and empirical usefulness. We find that socioeconomic conditions outweigh ageism, that is, the resilience of senior citizens in dealing with energy poverty during a transition is conditioned by their material standing and welfare state robustness rather than age-based. An important factor is household heating technology, which combined with economic vulnerability can push some individuals into energy poverty while others using alternative sources of heat can navigate through energy crises unscathed.
Conclusions
We note the importance of mainstreaming social inclusion considerations in energy policy and of targeted digital competence building which can enhance senior citizen integration in the energy transition. Lower levels of digital competences among senior citizens certainly play a role and need to be addressed with education programs to increase senior citizens participation. In both countries, household heating is a major issue and heating sources are strong predictors of energy poverty and regulatory measures and subsidies should be designed at national, regional, and municipal level to assist vulnerable groups in this area.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. Akrich, M. (1992). The De-scription of Technical Objects. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping Technology- Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change.
2. Alderdom—En hemmelig skam;Bakken R;Nytt Norsk Tidsskrift,2014
3. Bischof, A., & Jarke, J. (2021). Configuring the older adult: How age and ageing are reconfigured in gerontechnology design. In A. Peine, B. L. Marshall, W. Martin, & L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429278266
4. Energy poverty in the European Union: Landscapes of vulnerability;Bouzarovski S;WIREs Energy and Environment,2014
5. Low-Carbon Gentrification: When Climate Change Encounters Residential Displacement;Bouzarovski S;International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,2018
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献