Action researchers as “orchestrators” of coinnovation: A theoretical and methodological framework

Author:

Mliassen Marianne1,Arntzen¹ Carthrine1,Forslund¹ Lina1,Nikolaisen¹ Morten1,Alexandersson² Patrik2,Gramstad¹ Astrid1,Hellström² Andreas2

Affiliation:

1. UiT The Arctic University of Norway

2. Chalmers University of Technology

Abstract

Abstract Background With the increasing complexity of health care services, more comprehensive and integrated services need to be redesigned. Action research and collaborative innovation processes that emphasize multiactor participation and user-centered approaches are suggested to balance research that is meaningful for both the research community and health service development. Engagement by actors with a diverse range of perspectives, experiences, resources, and competences is emphasized to enhance creative problem solving and innovation. However, “orchestrating” innovation, in which actors have diverse attitudes, agendas, positions of power, and horizons of understanding, is challenging. The purpose of this article was therefore to explore how researchers can support collaborative and creative processes to enhance coinnovation in complex health care contexts. Methods Experiences from two Scandinavian cases of coinnovation form the foundation of this theoretical paper. Results We identified four central components that are essential for action researchers to facilitate collaborative and creative coinnovation processes: 1) relational power reflexibility, 2) resource integration, 3) joint understanding, and 4) the facilitation of creativity. Conclusions This paper offers a theoretical contribution to orchestrating diverse actors and their contributions by leveling out the asymmetrical distribution of power, ensuring the integration of relevant resources, creating a joint understanding, and facilitating creativity in coinnovation processes/projects.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference52 articles.

1. The challenge of complexity in health care;Plsek PE;BMJ,2001

2. Understanding healthcare social enterprises: a new public governance perspective;Chandra Y;J Soc Policy,2022

3. Managing the care of health and the cure of disease—Part I: differentiation;Glouberman S;Health Care Manag Rev,2001

4. Studying complexity in health services research: desperately seeking an overdue paradigm shift;Greenhalgh T;BMC Med,2018

5. Kodner DL, Spreeuwenberg C. Integrated care: meaning, logic, applications, and implications–A discussion paper. Int J Integr Care. 2002;2:e12.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3