A single-centre analysis of pregnancies with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS): from one-step surgery towards two-step surgical approach

Author:

Weydandt Laura1,Lia Massimiliano1,Schöne Amanda2,Hoffmann Janine1,Dornhöfer Nadja1,Aktas Bahriye1,Stepan Holger1

Affiliation:

1. University Hospital Leipzig

2. Sankt-Gertrauden-Hospital

Abstract

Abstract Background Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) can be the cause of major morbidity and its optimal management is still controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the traditional one-step surgery with a two-step surgical approach in which the placenta is left in situ and the second final operation is delayed to minimize blood loss. Methods We conducted a monocentric retrospective cohort study including all patients operated for PAS between 2006 and 2023. During this period, one-step surgery was abandoned and a two-step surgical approach was adopted. The number of units of red blood cells (RBC) needed during surgery were the primary outcomes used to compare these two approaches. Results A total of 43 cases were included in this analysis. Median blood loss during surgery was 2000 ml and 2800 ml for two-step and one-step surgery, respectively (p = 0.095). In the two-step surgical approach median number of RBC units transfused during surgery was significantly lower (p = 0.049) and the odds ratio for needing more than four units of RBC was 0.28 (95%-CI: 0.063 ‒ 1.15, p = 0.067). Longer interval between the caesarean section and the second operation showed a trend to lower blood loss (p = 0.065) and were associated with a significantly lower number of RBC units needed during surgery (p = 0.019). Conclusion Two-step surgery for the treatment of PAS was safe in our cohort and could lead to a reduction of blood transfusion. Leaving the placenta in situ and delay final operation represents a possible alternative to traditional cesarean hysterectomy (one-step surgery).

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3