Gene Content of Seawater Microbes is a Strong Predictor of Water Chemistry Across the Great Barrier Reef
Author:
Terzin Marko1, Robbins Steven J.2, Bell Sara C.1, Cao Kim-Anh Lê3, Gruber Renee K.1, Frade Pedro R.4, Webster Nicole S.5, Yeoh Yun Kit1, Bourne David G.6, Laffy Patrick W.1
Affiliation:
1. Australian Institute of Marine Science, PMB no3 Townsville MC, Townsville QLD 4810 2. Australian Centre for Ecogenomics, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072 3. Melbourne Integrative Genomics and School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Parkville VIC 3052 4. Natural History Museum Vienna, 1010 Vienna 5. Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, TAS, 7001 6. College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, 4811
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Seawater microbes (bacteria and archaea) play essential roles in coral reefs by facilitating nutrient cycling, energy transfer, and overall reef ecosystem functioning. However, environmental disturbances such as degraded water quality and marine heatwaves, can impact these vital functions as seawater microbial communities experience notable shifts in composition and function when exposed to stressors. This sensitivity highlights the potential of seawater microbes to be used as indicators of reef health. Microbial indicator analysis has centred around measuring the taxonomic composition of seawater microbial communities, but this can obscure heterogeneity of gene content between taxonomically similar microbes, and thus microbial functional genes have been hypothesised to have more scope for predictive potential, though empirical validation for this hypothesis is still pending. Here, we establish a functional baseline of seawater microbiomes across outer Great Barrier Reef (GBR) sites to compare the diagnostic value between taxonomic and functional information in inferring continuous physico-chemical metrics in the surrounding reef.
Results
Integrating gene-centric analyses with 17 physico-chemical variables (temperature, salinity, and particulate and dissolved nutrients) across 48 reefs revealed that associations between microbial functions and environmental parameters were twice as stable compared to taxonomy-environment associations. Distinct seasonal variations in surface water chemistry were observed, with nutrient concentrations up to 3-fold higher during austral summer explained by enhanced production of particulate organic matter (POM) primarily by Synechococcus, whereas in winter, nutrient levels were lower and POM production was also attributed to Prochlorococcus. Additionally, heterotrophic microbes (e.g., Rhodospirillaceae, Burkholderiaceae, Flavobacteriaceae, and Rhodobacteraceae) were enriched in reefs with elevated dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and phytoplankton-derived POM, encoding functional genes related to membrane transport, sugar utilisation, and energy metabolism. These microbes likely contribute to the coral reef microbial loop by capturing and recycling nutrients derived from Synechococcus and Prochlorococcus, ultimately transferring nutrients from picocyanobacterial primary producers to higher trophic levels.
Conclusion
This study reveals that functional information in reef-associated seawater microbes robustly associates with physico-chemical variables than taxonomic data, highlighting the importance of incorporating microbial function in reef monitoring initiatives. Our integrative approach to mine for stable seawater microbial biomarkers can be expanded to include additional continuous metrics of reef health (e.g., benthic cover of corals and macroalgae, fish counts/biomass) and may be applicable to other large-scale reef metagenomics datasets beyond the GBR.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference147 articles.
1. 1. De’ath G, Fabricius KE, Sweatman H, Puotinen M. The 27-year decline of coral cover on the Great Barrier Reef and its causes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:17995–9. 2. 2. Hoegh-Guldberg O, Poloczanska ES, Skirving W, Dove S. Coral Reef Ecosystems under Climate Change and Ocean Acidification. Frontiers in Marine Science [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2023 May 30];4. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2017.00158 3. 3. Hughes TP, Barnes ML, Bellwood DR, Cinner JE, Cumming GS, Jackson JBC, et al. Coral reefs in the Anthropocene. Nature. 2017;546:82–90. 4. 4. Souter D, Planes S, Wicquart J, Logan M, Obura D, Staub F. Status of Coral Reefs of the World: 2020. 2020; 5. 5. Eddy TD, Lam VWY, Reygondeau G, Cisneros-Montemayor AM, Greer K, Palomares MLD, et al. Global decline in capacity of coral reefs to provide ecosystem services. One Earth. 2021;4:1278–85.
|
|