Affiliation:
1. Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College
2. the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The use of digital subtraction angiography (DSA)-guided placement for tunneled dialysis catheter (TDC) placement is preferred in developed countries due to its higher success rate and accurate positioning. However, in developing countries with limited medical resources, the procedure is typically only performed under ultrasound guidance. The healthcare system is facing challenges due to the shortage of resources and financial pressures. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of DSA-guided catheter placement compared to ultrasound-guided placement in developing countries.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study included all TDC insertions at a hospital between January 2020 and October 2022. Patient demographics, laboratory results, surgical details, and hemodialysis information were collected. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the demographics and clinical characteristics between the DSA-guided and ultrasound-guided groups. Adverse events, catheter function, catheter tip position, and costs were evaluated.
Results
After matching, there were no significant differences between the groups. Both groups achieved adequate catheter blood flow and ultrafiltration volumes without deviations from dialysis prescriptions. The DSA-guided group had fewer events leading to early termination of dialysis compared to the ultrasound-guided group. Catheter tip position in the right atrium was more consistent in the DSA-guided group. Cost analysis showed higher expenses with DSA-guided procedures. When the study was limited to patients with catheter tips located in the right atrium, there was no significant difference in adverse events between the two groups.
Conclusion
The performance of hemodialysis catheters inserted under DSA guidance is superior to those inserted under ultrasound guidance during postoperative blood dialysis. This may be related to the position of the tip of the catheter. We recommend using DSA when it cannot be ensured that the tip of the catheter is located in the right atrium.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference22 articles.
1. Fistula first initiative: advantages and pitfalls [J];Lok CE;Clin J Am Soc Nephrol,2007
2. Associations between hemodialysis access type and clinical outcomes: a systematic review [J];Ravani P;J Am Soc Nephrol,2013
3. Clinical practice guidelines for peritoneal dialysis adequacy [J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2006, 48 Suppl 1: S98-129.DOI:10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.04.006
4. Lok C E, Huber T S, Lee T, et al. KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Vascular Access: 2019 Update [J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2020, 75(4 Suppl 2): S1-s164.DOI:10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.12.001
5. Brass P, Hellmich M, Kolodziej L, et al. Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for internal jugular vein catheterization [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015, 1(1): Cd006962.DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD006962.pub2