Prognostic Accuracy of Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA)-lactate for Mortality of Adult with Infection: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author:

Lie Khie Chen1,Pasaribu Adeline1,Shakinah Sharifah1,Sinto Robert1,Harimurti Kuntjoro1,Nainggolan Leonard1

Affiliation:

1. University of Indonesia

Abstract

Abstract The high burden of infection mortality worldwide calls for the need for prompt risk assessment of its outcome. This article studied for accuracy of quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) combined with lactate measurement in predicting the mortality of adult patients with infection. Literature searching was performed in PubMed/Medline®, CINAHL®, Embase®, CENTRAL®, Proquest®, Scopus®, and hand searching of journals. All studies in searching keywords “infection”, “quick sequential organ failure assessment”, “qsofa”, “lactate” with Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms were included. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of qSOFA-lactate accuracy were analysed using the R program. Twenty-six studies comprised of 43,207 adult patients with infection were included in this review. Studies were performed in the emergency department, ward, and intensive care unit, with mortality rates ranging from 3.8% − 53.6%. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of 20 studies were 81.3% (95% CI 72.3%, 87.8%; I2 = 97%, p < 0.01) and 62.3% (95% CI 50.5%, 72.8%; I2 = 100%, p = 0). The AUC of qSOFA-lactate was 0.773 (95% CI 0.74, 0.80). There was no significant difference in accuracy results between septic and non-septic patients. The qSOFA-lactate measurement had good accuracy in predicting mortality in adult infectious patients.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference49 articles.

1. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3);Singer M;JAMA - J Am Med Assoc,2016

2. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, Shackelford KA, Tsoi D, Kievlan DR, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet [Internet]. 2020;395(10219):200–11. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7

3. World Health Organization (WHO). Global report on the epidemiology and burden of sepsis: current evidence, identifying gaps and future directions [Internet]. Global report on the epidemiology and burden of sepsis: current evidence, identifying gaps and future directions. 2020. 56 p. Available from: http://apps.who.int/bookorders.%0Ahttps://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/334216/9789240010789-eng.pdf

4. Assessment of clinical criteria for sepsis for the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3);Seymour CW;JAMA - J Am Med Assoc,2016

5. The Logistic Organ Dysfunction system. A new way to assess organ dysfunction in the intensive care unit;Gall JR;ICU Scoring Group. JAMA,1996

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3