Pop-off mechanisms as renoprotective mediators in children with posterior urethral valves: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Montero Javier Arredondo1ORCID,Riveros Blanca Paola Pérez1,Asfura Oscar Emilio Bueso1,Martín-Calvo Nerea1

Affiliation:

1. University of Navarra

Abstract

Abstract Background Pop-off mechanisms are potential pressure-relieving mediators in patients diagnosed with posterior urethral valves (PUV). These mechanisms include, among others, urachal persistence, urinomas, bladder diverticula and unilateral high-grade vesicoureteral reflux. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize the existing evidence regarding the protective effect of pop-off mechanisms on renal function in children with PUV. Methods We conducted a systematic review of the literature that involved an extensive search in the main databases of medical bibliography. Three independent reviewers selected the relevant articles based on the previously defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Methodological quality of the selected article was rated using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale index. Data extraction was performed by three independent reviewers. We used random meta-analyses to compare different outcomes (serum creatine, Nadir serum creatinine, and renal failure) between children with PUV and pop-off mechanisms and those with PUV but without pop-off mechanisms. Results 10 studies with data from 896 participants were included in this review. The age of the participants ranged from 0 to 25 years. Seven articles reported serum creatinine values for each group and 3 of them found significant differences between groups. The random-effects meta-analysis for serum creatinine showed significant lower mean (diff=-52.88 µmol/L [95% CI -73.65 to -32.11]) in the group of children with pop-off mechanisms, and the random-effects meta-analysis for Nadir serum creatinine showed a marginally significant lower mean in the group of children with pop-off mechanisms (diff=-12.00 µmol/L [95% CI -24.04 to 0.04]). The random-effect meta-analysis for renal failure resulted in a significant risk reduction on the group of children with pop-off mechanisms (odds ratio = 0.48 [95% CI 0.23 to 0.98]). Conclusions Children with PUV and pop-off mechanisms show better renal function and lower risk of renal failure than those with PUV but without pop-off mechanisms suggesting these mechanisms may act as renoprotective mediums. The high heterogeneity between studies in the assessment of renal function and long-term outcomes compel to interpret these findings with caution. Future studies that stratify by the different types of pop-off mechanisms and use standardized metrics, such as Nadir creatinine are needed.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3